Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40289155›Full record

ArticleTranslational psychiatry2025

Predictive modeling of response to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in treatment-resistant depression.

Lindsay L Benster, Cory R Weissman, Federico Suprani, Kamryn Toney, Houtan Afshar, Noah Stapper, Vanessa Tello, Louise Stolz, Mohsen Poorganji, Zafiris J Daskalakis and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Neurodevelopmental considerations for transcranial magnetic stimulation trials in youth.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Lindsay L BensterDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0510-6448
Cory R WeissmanDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5087-8263
Federico SupraniSection of Psychiatry, Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
Kamryn ToneyMorehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Houtan AfsharDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA.
Noah StapperDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1674-6718
Vanessa TelloDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA.
Louise StolzDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA.
Mohsen PoorganjiDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA.
Zafiris J DaskalakisDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA.
Lawrence G AppelbaumDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA.
Jordan N KohnHerbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA. jokohn@health.ucsd.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8546-2076

Funding

Psychiatry Research Residency Training TrackR25MH101072 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI NEAL R SWERDLOW · 2013 to 2026
$2.8M
Cortical Inhibition as a Biomarker of Response in a Comparison of Bilateral versus Unilateral Accelerated Theta Burst Stimulation for Suicidal Ideation in Treatment-Resistant Depression -COMBAT-SIK23MH138746 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Cory R Weissman · 2024 to 2026
$593k
NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH138746NIMH NIH HHS R25 MH101072
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying predictors of treatment response to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) remain elusive in treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Leveraging electronic medical records (EMR), this retrospective cohort study applied supervised machine learning (ML) to sociodemographic, clinical, and treatment-related data to predict depressive symptom response (>50% reduction on PHQ-9) and remission (PHQ-9 < 5) following rTMS in 232 patients with TRD (mean age: 54.5, 63.4% women) treated at the University of California, San Diego Interventional Psychiatry Program between 2017 and 2023. ML models were internally validated using nested cross-validation and Shapley values were calculated to quantify contributions of each feature to response prediction. The best-fit models proved reasonably accurate at discriminating treatment responders (Area under the curve (AUC): 0.689 [0.638, 0.740], p < 0.01) and remitters (AUC 0.745 [0.692, 0.797], p < 0.01), though only the response model was well-calibrated. Both models were associated with significant net benefits, indicating their potential utility for clinical decision-making. Shapley values revealed that patients with comorbid anxiety, obesity, concurrent benzodiazepine or antipsychotic use, and more chronic TRD were less likely to respond or remit following rTMS. Patients with trauma and former tobacco users were more likely to respond. Furthermore, delivery of intermittent theta burst stimulation and more rTMS sessions were associated with superior outcomes. These findings highlight the potential of ML-guided techniques to guide clinical decision-making for rTMS treatment in patients with TRD to optimize therapeutic outcomes.

Indexed as

Depressive Disorder, Treatment-ResistantSupervised Machine LearningTranscranial Magnetic StimulationAdultAgedElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID40289155
PMCPMC12034820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.