ArticleBMC infectious diseases2025
Developing an element system of hospital resilience to medical run in major emerging infectious diseases: a Delphi study.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMajor emerging infectious diseases often trigger the "medical run", presenting significant challenges to health systems. Developing hospital resilience is crucial for enhancing the capacity to manage such crises. Therefore, this research aimed to construct an element system of hospital resilience to medical run in major emerging infectious diseases.
methodsUtilizing the 4R conceptual model and literature content analysis, a preliminary draft for hospital resilience was developed. Subsequently, a two-round Delphi survey involving 18 Chinese experts across various fields refined this system. The Standard for Conducting And Reporting Delphi Studies (CREDES) guided this process. The weights of each element were determined using the analytic hierarchy process.
resultsThe effective recovery rate for both Delphi rounds were 100% (18/18), with an authority coefficient of 0.9159. The first round revealed a Kendall's concordance coefficient for total elements of 0.136 (P < 0.05); the second round showed a coefficient of 0.214 (P < 0.05). The final element system included four primary elements (Resourcefulness, Redundancy, Robustness, Recovery), 21 secondary elements, and 65 tertiary elements, with weights of 0.2908, 0.2056, 0.4348, and 0.0688, respectively.
conclusionsThis study constructed the element system of hospital resilience to medical run in major emerging infectious diseases. The results are designed to elucidate the components of hospital resilience in the context of major emerging infectious disease, which can help mitigate the impact of medical run. The study will provide hospitals with a checklist and assessment program for enhancing resilience, offering significant implications for the development of hospital training and management strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.