ArticleInfectious diseases of poverty2025
Mitigating host microRNA interference to enhance mRNA vaccine efficacy in public health interventions.
Article in Infectious diseases of poverty, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWhile mRNA vaccines represent a transformative platform for infectious disease control, their efficacy in antigen-presenting cells (APCs) remains vulnerable to endogenous regulatory networks, particularly microRNA (miR)-mediated translational suppression. This study addresses a critical gap in current vaccine design paradigms by systematically investigating host miR interference - an understudied barrier to robust antigen production. MAIN TEXT: APCs express cell-type-specific miR repertoires capable of binding vaccine mRNAs through conserved seed sequences, as evidenced by synthesis of experimental data from 67 studies demonstrating miR-mediated repression of exogenous transcripts. To decode these inhibitory interactions, the commentary proposes an integrated multi-omics framework combining Argonaute immunoprecipitation with crosslinking-based miR-mRNA interactome sequencing, enabling precise mapping of miR-vaccine mRNA binding events in vaccine-transfected APCs. Furthermore, the commentary suggests two actionable strategies for evading miR interference: (1) Synonymous codon optimization at seed-match regions, achieving binding energy reduction while preserving antigenicity through degeneracy of genetic coding; (2) Targeted co-delivery of miR inhibitors. By bridging host RNA biology and vaccine engineering, this work provides a blueprint for developing miR-resistant mRNA vaccines for public health interventions.
conclusionsmiRs may inhibit mRNA vaccine translation in APCs, potentially reducing antigen production and weakening the resulting immune response. To address this, next-generation mRNA vaccines should incorporate "miR-proofing" strategies during design to avoid miR interference.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.