SynthesisJournal of medical systems2025
Target-Controlled Infusion of Propofol: A Systematic Review of Recent Results.
Synthesis in Journal of medical systems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07586189 (Comparison of Hemodynamic Responses During Anesthesia Induction Using Eleveld and Schnider Target-Controlled Infusion Models. A Randomized Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparison of Hemodynamic Responses During Anesthesia Induction Using Eleveld and Schnider Target-Controlled Infusion Models. A Randomized Trial
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy and Safety of Ciprofol Versus Propofol for Anesthesia in Older Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Drugs & aging · 2026Pooled it
- SAFE (Subarachnoid-Alternative Anaesthesia for Endoprosthesis): A Motor-Sparing and Opioid-Sparing Anesthetic Technique for Hip Fracture Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Analgosedation During the Use of Non-Invasive Respiratory Supports: A Synthesis of Clinical Evidence and Best Practices.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Target-Controlled Infusion for Caesarean Delivery Under General Anesthesia: From Conventional Pharmacokinetic Models to Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Controversial Aspects in Sedative Techniques for Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy (DISE)-A Narrative Review.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Toward adaptive therapeutic timing: integration of mechanistic pharmacology and artificial intelligence in precision dosing.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study presents a systematic review conducted according to the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, evaluating pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) models for target-controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol. A structured search was performed across PubMed, Summon, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus, identifying 427 sources, of which 17 met the inclusion criteria. The analysis revealed that nine studies compared existing models, six focused on the development of new PK-PD models, and two explored broader implications of TCI in anesthesia. Comparative studies indicate that while the Eleveld model generally offers superior predictive accuracy, it does not consistently outperform the Marsh and Schnider models across all populations. The Schnider model demonstrated better bias control in elderly patients, while the Eleveld model improved drug clearance estimation in obese patients. However, inconsistencies remain in predicting brain concentrations of propofol. Newly proposed models introduce adaptive dosing strategies, incorporating allometric scaling, lean body weight, and machine learning techniques, yet require further external validation. The results highlight ongoing challenges in achieving universal applicability of TCI models, underscoring the need for future research in refining precision dosing and personalized anesthesia management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.