ArticlePrevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research2025
Healing of the Canoe: Preliminary Suicide Prevention Outcomes Among Participating and Non-Participating Youth.
Article in Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Healing of the Canoe (HOC) is a community-derived, culturally grounded, and flexible curriculum for Native youth that builds a connection to culture and community and teaches skills that increase participants' feelings of hope, optimism, and self-efficacy. This exploratory study is the first to examine self-reported survey outcomes after the addition of suicide prevention and intervention modules into the curriculum and includes a comparison group of similar youth. Repeated measures analysis of variance (rANOVA) models examined changes in scores from the Pre-Survey to the Post-Survey for an intervention group and a comparison group of youth in 2018-2019. Survey responses were combined into composite scores for the following categories of interest: hope, mental health, help-seeking and helping, suicide attempts, culture, and resilience. There were 74 youth in the intervention group (IG) and 59 in the non-intervention group (NIG) who completed both Pre- and Post-Surveys. The IG experienced significant positive effects on the hope and resilience scales from Pre- to Post-Survey, while the youth in the NIG saw a decrease in these same scales from Pre- to Post-Survey. The NIG experienced worse outcomes for mental health, while the IG saw a slight improvement. Despite a small number of youth participants and the naturalistic setting, which limited the ability to control for potential confounding variables, the results from this preliminary study are promising. Future studies with larger numbers of youth and more ability to account for additional factors may potentially show even more benefits of the HOC curriculum.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.