ArticleUpdates in surgery2026
Sequential comparison of single-stage laparoscopic common bile duct exploration combined with cholecystectomy.
Article in Updates in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) combined with laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) is used to treat gallbladder (GB) stones combined with common bile duct (CBD) stones. Patients with GB stones combined with CBD stones who underwent single-stage LC + LCBDE surgery in our center from January 2020 to November 2023 were retrospectively analyzed and divided into LC-BDE and BDE-LC groups. LC-BDE was performed in patients with cystic duct diameter ≥ 0.5 cm, and BDE-LC was performed in patients with cystic duct diameter < 0.5 cm. Baseline data, preoperative conditions, operative details, postoperative hospitalization, postoperative care, and complication rates were compared between patients in the two groups. A total of 240 patients were included, including 72 in the LC-BDE group and 168 in the BDE-LC group. There was a significant difference between the two groups in terms of intraoperative blood loss (5 (0, 16) mL vs. 16 (10, 20) mL, P < 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of operative time (130.2 (110.0, 168.6) min vs. 125.0 (105.0, 150.0) min, P = 0.112), and postoperative complications such as bile leakage (8.3 vs. 11.9%, P = 0.415). Different operative sequences of cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration in the single-stage surgical treatment of GB stones combined with CBD stones were acceptable in terms of bile duct stone clearance and postoperative complication rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40289045What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.