ArticleNMR in biomedicine2025
Simultaneous Acquisition of Water, Fat, and Velocity Images Using a Phase-Contrast T2*-IDEAL Method.
Article in NMR in biomedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Water-fat separation MRI techniques use frequency differences between water and fat encoded in the phase of the MR signal. Similarly, phase-contrast MRI (2D PC-MRI) uses phase differences to estimate blood flow velocity. This study proposes to enhance efficiency by acquiring both images in a single scan, resulting in co-registered images of water-fat species and velocity. This work introduces a method that combines phase-contrast with T2*-IDEAL to acquire water-fat components and velocity images in a single MR acquisition. We developed a phase-contrast multi-echo (PCME-MRI) acquisition to obtain IDEAL MR images with velocity encoding. Our T2*-IDEAL method estimates velocity and separates water-fat components by considering three chemical species: fat concentration and two water components with velocity information. The proposed PC T2*-IDEAL method was validated with a numerical phantom and 2D MR axial images of the neck in 14 healthy volunteers, measuring blood flow in the carotid arteries and water-fat components around the region of interest. In volunteers, the median and range MAE when comparing PC T2*-IDEAL and standard T2*-IDEAL fat fraction was 0.06
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.