Observational studyBMJ open2025
Predicting 30-day survival after in-hospital cardiac arrest: a nationwide cohort study using machine learning and SHAP analysis.
Observational study in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Can Artificial Intelligence Interpret Pulmonary Function Tests and Predict Prolonged Air Leaks After Lung Resection.Cancers · 2026Article
- Current and emerging innovations in technology, strategy, and artificial intelligence: a new era in cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation.World journal of emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Nonlinear association between visceral fat metabolism score and heart failure: insights from LightGBM modeling and SHAP-Driven feature interpretation in NHANES.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveIn-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) presents a critical challenge with low survival rates and limited prediction tools. Despite advances in resuscitation, predicting 30-day survival remains difficult, and current methods lack interpretability for timely decision-making. This study developed a machine learning (ML) model to predict 30-day survival after IHCA, using peri-arrest variables available on the rescue team's arrival, while ensuring a balance between predictive accuracy and clinical interpretability through Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP).
designA nationwide, registry-based observational study.
settingData were sourced from the Swedish Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Registry (2010-2020), merged with the Patient Registry.
participantsWe analysed 25 905 IHCA cases with attempted resuscitation, of which 8166 patients survived for 30 days. OUTCOME MEASURE AND ANALYSIS: 30-day survival after IHCA was the outcome measure. An ML model was developed using fivefold cross-validation. Key predictors were identified through in-built variable importance and validated using SHAP. Model performance was evaluated with metrics such as area under the receiver operating characteristics (AUROC), calibration, sensitivity, specificity, false negative rate (FNR) and F-score.
resultsThe CatBoost model achieved an AUROC of 0.9136 (95% CI 0.9075 to 0.9191) with all features, and 0.9034 (95% CI 0.8955 to 0.9037) with the top 15 features, along with Brier scores of 0.1028 and 0.1103, respectively. Performance plateaued after including the top 15 predictors, with few key variables, such as epinephrine administration, age, initial rhythm, ROSC within 15 min, breathing on rescue team arrival and witnessed cardiac arrest, being most influential. The model showed strong calibration for patients with low predicted survival probabilities and demonstrated high sensitivity with a low FNR across relevant survival thresholds.
conclusionThe CatBoost model provides an effective and interpretable tool for predicting 30-day survival after IHCA. Key predictors such as epinephrine administration, age and initial rhythm inform clinical decision-making. This model has strong clinical utility and can be externally validated via the open-access Application Programming Interface (API) at www.gocares.se.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.