ArticleAmerican journal on intellectual and developmental disabilities2025
Team Science in Precision Medicine Research:The Case for Inclusion of Adults With Intellectual Disability.
Article in American journal on intellectual and developmental disabilities, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adults with Intellectual Disability and Consent to Precision Medicine Research: Using Supported Decision-Making to Facilitate First-Person Consent.The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics · 2026Article
- Situating genetic counseling research: The role of the sociopolitical climate in research production and interpretation.Journal of genetic counseling · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The inclusion of adults with intellectual disability (ID) in precision medicine research has scientific, public health, and social justice justifications. Yet there is an indication that this population is excluded from general (i.e., nondisability specific) health research, including precision medicine research. Adults with ID are thus unlikely to reap the benefits emerging from such scientific endeavors-today and in the future. In this commentary, we explore key issues in research ethics, including cohort diversity, the principle of justice, and consent, and discuss their ramifications for adults with ID and precision medicine researchers. We call for endorsing team science collaboration and community engagement to promote health equity for adults with ID and disability justice in precision medicine research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.