Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40288606›Full record

ArticleEndocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists2025

Assessing Clinician Engagement With a Passive Clinical Decision Support System for Liver Fibrosis Risk Stratification in a Weight Management Clinic.

Arpan Mohanty, Kirsten Austad, Nicholas A Bosch, Michelle T Long, Eric Nolen-Doerr, Allan J Walkey, Mari-Lynn Drainoni, Ivania Rizo, Kathryn L Fantasia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. [Research progress and future prospects for artificial intelligence in the diagnosis and treatment of fatty liver disease].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Arpan MohantySection of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts. Electronic address: amohanty@bu.edu.
Kirsten AustadDepartment of Family Medicine, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; Evans Center for Implementation and Improvement Sciences (CIIS), Department of Medicine, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
Nicholas A BoschEvans Center for Implementation and Improvement Sciences (CIIS), Department of Medicine, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts; Section of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care and Sleep, Department of Medicine, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
Michelle T LongMedical & Science, Clinical Drug Development, Novo Nordisk A/S, Søborg, Denmark.
Eric Nolen-DoerrSection of Endocrinology Diabetes and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
Allan J WalkeyDivision of Health Systems Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts.
Mari-Lynn DrainoniEvans Center for Implementation and Improvement Sciences (CIIS), Department of Medicine, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts; Section of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Health Law Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Ivania RizoSection of Endocrinology Diabetes and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
Kathryn L FantasiaEvans Center for Implementation and Improvement Sciences (CIIS), Department of Medicine, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts; Section of Endocrinology Diabetes and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

Diabetes-Docs: Physician-Scientist Career Development Program (DiabDocs)K12DK133995 · NIDDK · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI LINDA A DIMEGLIO, David Matthew Maahs · 2022 to 2026
$16.0M
NIDDK NIH HHS K12 DK133995
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMetabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease is common in obesity. Guidelines recommend liver fibrosis risk stratification with tools such as Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index, liver stiffness measurement with vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) and/or hepatology referral for elevated FIB-4. Despite recommendations, implementation remains limited. Using mixed methods, we evaluated a 3-strategy implementation bundle to improve fibrosis risk stratification-a FIB-4-based electronic health record embedded clinical decision support system (CDSS), educational outreach, and internal facilitation in a weight management clinic.

methodsThe primary outcome was penetration: the proportion of patients with elevated FIB-4 completing VCTE or hepatology referral. We compared rates, pre and postactivation of implementation bundle using Fischer's exact test. Semi-structured provider interviews, guided by the i-PARIHS framework, assessed acceptability and feasibility 3 months postimplementation.

resultsIn the preactivation phase, 880 out of 3933 (22.4%) weight management visits had the necessary labs to calculate automated FIB-4 scores with 128 elevated scores. In the postactivation phase, 2513 of 4634 weight management visits (54.2%) had automated FIB-4 scores; with 234 elevated score. Preactivation, there were no VCTE and 2 hepatology referrals. Postactivation, there were 3 VCTE referrals and 2 hepatology referrals (Fischer's exact test P value = 1.00). Providers cited shared responsibility with primary care, low awareness and trust in risk-stratification tools, workflow challenges, and competing demands as barriers. Educational outreach and facilitation improved CDSS engagement, while technical issues reduced it.

conclusionThis implementation strategy bundle did not achieve meaningful metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease fibrosis risk stratification. Electronic health record-based CDSS shows promise but requires alignment with provider priorities, seamless workflow integration, and robust technical infrastructure.

Indexed as

Decision Support Systems, ClinicalLiver CirrhosisObesityWeight Reduction ProgramsAdultElasticity Imaging TechniquesElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReferral and ConsultationRisk Assessmentfatty liverFIB4MASHMASLDsignificant liver fibrosisVCTE

Identifiers

PMID40288606
PMCPMC13006893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.