Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40288409›Full record

ArticleArquivos de neuro-psiquiatria2025

Radial motor nerve conduction study in posterior interosseous nerve syndrome and multifocal motor neuropathy.

José Pedro S Baima, Carlos Otto Heise

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

José Pedro S BaimaUniversidade de São Paulo, Departamento de Neurologia, São Paulo SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2708-1181
Carlos Otto HeiseUniversidade de São Paulo, Departamento de Neurologia, São Paulo SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3956-3073

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFinger extension weakness could be a presentation of either posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) syndrome or multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN). However, there is a delay in the diagnosis of MMN in cases with a selective radial weakness, as they are frequently misdiagnosed as PIN.

objectiveTo analyze which variables in nerve conduction studies could aid in the early diagnosis of MMN.

methodsWe reviewed charts of patients with diagnoses of MMN or PIN syndrome, from 2014 to 2022, in a single Brazilian reference center. Electrophysiological parameters included in the analysis were motor conduction velocity (CV), the presence and magnitude of conduction block (CB), distal motor latencies (DML), and the compound muscle action potential amplitude (CMAP) of the affected radial nerve.

resultsA total of 44 radial nerves were included in the study. Axonal loss was associated with a diagnosis of PIN syndrome, while conduction block was associated with MMN (

conclusionThe presence of CB or the absence of distal CMAP amplitude reduction should lead physicians to consider MMN, and a comprehensive nerve conduction study should be performed.

Indexed as

Neural ConductionPolyneuropathiesRadial NerveAction PotentialsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNerve Conduction StudiesRetrospective StudiesSyndromeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40288409
PMCPMC12034393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.