Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40288398›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Global health2025

Effects and costs of a multi-component menstrual health intervention (MENISCUS) on mental health problems, educational performance, and menstrual health in Ugandan secondary schools: an open-label, school-based, cluster-randomised controlled trial.

Kate A Nelson, Stephen Lagony, Catherine Kansiime, Belen Torondel, Clare Tanton, Denis Ndekezi, Levicatus Mugenyi, Ratifah Batuusa, Christopher Baleke, Katherine A Thomas and 21 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

31 authors.

Kate A NelsonMRC International Statistics and Epidemiology Group, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK. Electronic address: kate.nelson@lshtm.ac.uk.
Stephen LagonyMedical Research Council/Uganda Virus Research Institute and London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Uganda.
Catherine KansiimeAfrica Research Excellence Fund, MRC Unit The Gambia at The London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Fajara, The Gambia.
Belen TorondelDepartment of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Clare TantonDepartment of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Denis NdekeziMedical Research Council/Uganda Virus Research Institute and London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Uganda.
Levicatus MugenyiMedical Research Council/Uganda Virus Research Institute and London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Uganda.
Ratifah BatuusaMedical Research Council/Uganda Virus Research Institute and London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Uganda.
Christopher BalekeMedical Research Council/Uganda Virus Research Institute and London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Uganda.
Katherine A ThomasMRC International Statistics and Epidemiology Group, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Titus SsesangaMedical Research Council/Uganda Virus Research Institute and London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Uganda.
Robert BakanomaMedical Research Council/Uganda Virus Research Institute and London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Uganda.
Prossy NamirembeMedical Research Council/Uganda Virus Research Institute and London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Uganda.
Aggrey TumuhimbiseMedical Research Council/Uganda Virus Research Institute and London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Uganda.
Beatrice NanyongaMedical Research Council/Uganda Virus Research Institute and London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Uganda.
Rodah NambiMedical Research Council/Uganda Virus Research Institute and London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Uganda.
Edward ObichoMedical Research Council/Uganda Virus Research Institute and London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Uganda.
Denis SsenyondwaMedical Research Council/Uganda Virus Research Institute and London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Uganda.
Daria BucciDepartment of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Sophie BelfieldWoMena Uganda, Kampala, Uganda.
Agnes Akech OcenWoMena Uganda, Kampala, Uganda.
Shamirah NakalemaWoMena Uganda, Kampala, Uganda.
Connie AlezuyoMinistry of Education and Sports, Kampala, Uganda.
Fred MatovuPolicy Analysis and Development Research Institute, School of Economics, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Stella NeemaDepartment of Sociology and Anthropology, School of Social Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Nambusi KyegombeDepartment of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Medical Research Council/Uganda Virus Research Institute and London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Uganda.
Giulia GrecoDepartment of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
John JerrimInstitute of Education, University College London, London, UK.
Chris BonellDepartment of Public Health, Environments and Society, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Janet A SeeleyDepartment of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Helen A WeissMRC International Statistics and Epidemiology Group, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMenstrual health is a human rights issue, affecting many aspects of life including mental health, wellbeing, and education. We assessed the effectiveness and costs of a school-based, multi-component menstrual health intervention (MENISCUS) to improve mental health problems and educational performance among in-school adolescents.

methodsWe conducted a parallel-arm, cluster-randomised trial in secondary schools in Wakiso and Kalungu districts in Uganda. Schools were eligible for inclusion if they had both male and female students; senior 1-4 classes; day or mixed day and boarding students; at least minimal water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) facilities; and enrolments of 50-125 female Senior 1 students in Wakiso district and 40-125 female Senior 1 students in Kalungu district. Schools were randomised (1:1) to the intervention or control condition, stratified by district and baseline mean school examination score. The intervention included creating action groups, strengthening teacher-delivered puberty education, distributing menstrual kits, supporting student-led drama skits, providing pain-management strategies, and improving school water and sanitation facilities. The control condition was provision of printed government menstrual health materials. Schools, participants, and implementors, including the study clinician who monitored adverse events, could not be masked to allocation status. Primary outcomes were mental health problems using the Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) Total Difficulties Score and independently assessed educational performance at individual level, assessed in all female participants at endline. We estimated cluster-intention-to-treat intervention effects using mixed-effects models accounting for school clustering and adjusted for randomisation strata and baseline school-level means of outcomes. The study was registered at the ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN45461276 and is completed.

findings60 randomly selected schools (44 from Wakiso and 16 from Kalungu) were randomly assigned (30 per group) to the intervention or the control group, and none withdrew. Between March 21 and July 5, 2022, 3841 female students participated in baseline assessments (89·7% of those eligible) and between June 5 and Aug 22, 2023, 3356 participated in endline assessments (1666 in the control group and 1690 in the intervention group). Female participants had a median age of 16 years (IQR 15-16). At endline, there was no evidence of a difference in mental health problems (mean SDQ score, 10·8 in the intervention group vs 10·7 in the control group; adjusted mean difference [aMD] 0·05 [95% CI -0·40 to 0·50]) nor educational performance (mean z score, 0·20 in the intervention group vs 0·12 in the control group; aMD 0·05 [95% CI -0·10 to 0·19]), despite improvements to menstrual health. The annual implementation cost was US$85 per Senior 2 female student. One participant had a serious adverse event (severe anaemia secondary to excess vaginal bleeding), which was deemed to be possibly related to the intervention.

interpretationImproving multiple dimensions of menstrual health in secondary schools in Uganda is important for health and human rights but is not sufficient to improve mental health or educational performance over 1 year.

fundingUK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office; Medical Research Council; Department of Health and Social Care; and Wellcome.

Indexed as

Educational StatusMenstruationMental DisordersMental HealthSchool Health ServicesAdolescentFemaleHumansMaleSchoolsStudentsUganda

Identifiers

PMID40288398
PMCPMC12041187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.