ArticleComputers in biology and medicine2025
Benchmarking HEp-2 cell segmentation methods in indirect immunofluorescence images - standard models to deep learning.
Article in Computers in biology and medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Indirect Immunofluorescence (IIF) stained Human Epithelial (HEp-2) cells are considered the gold standard for detecting autoimmune diseases. Accurate cell segmentation, though often viewed as an intermediary step to downstream tasks like classification, significantly enhances overall performance when executed with precision. In this study, we conduct a systematic literature review of HEp-2 cell segmentation techniques, identifying 28 key papers utilizing traditional image processing, machine learning classifiers, deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs), and generative adversarial network (GAN) frameworks. Building on these insights, we benchmark 17 CNN models without pretraining and 8 CNN models pretrained on ImageNet using both Frozen Encoder and Tunable Encoder strategies on the I3A dataset. Cross-validation (CV) and Benjamini-Hochberg (BH) significance correction were employed to ensure statistical rigor in model comparisons. Domain-Specific Pretraining (DSPT) experiments demonstrated performance improvements, particularly for underrepresented classes, while Data Augmentation strategies (DA-1 and DA-2) revealed distinct impacts across model categories. GAN-based segmentation experiments using the top-performing CNN architectures as generators within a Pix2Pix framework revealed performance degradation due to data limitations and adversarial training instabilities. Nonetheless, GANs displayed class-specific improvements in visual alignment of segmentation masks. Results were evaluated comprehensively across eight performance metrics, including Dice, IOU, Accuracy, Precision, Sensitivity, Specificity, AU-ROC and AU-PR. This work offers a robust benchmarking of state-of-the-art CNN, GAN, and Transformer-based models for HEp-2 cell segmentation, providing valuable insights for future research directions, including ensemble approaches, dynamic patch sampling, and diffusion models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.