Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40288291›Full record

ArticleComputers in biology and medicine2025

Benchmarking HEp-2 cell segmentation methods in indirect immunofluorescence images - standard models to deep learning.

Balaji Iyer, Smruti Deoghare, Krish Ranjan, Bruce J Aronow, V B Surya Prasath

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computers in biology and medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Balaji IyerDivision of Biomedical Informatics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA; Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Cincinnati, OH 45221, USA. Electronic address: iyerbs@mail.uc.edu.
Smruti DeoghareDivision of Biomedical Informatics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA; Department of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, OH 45267, USA.
Krish RanjanDivision of Biomedical Informatics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA.
Bruce J AronowDivision of Biomedical Informatics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA; Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati, USA; Department of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, OH 45267, USA.
V B Surya PrasathDivision of Biomedical Informatics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA; Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati, USA; Department of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, OH 45267, USA; Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Cincinnati, OH 45221, USA.

Funding

The LungMAP Data Coordination Center for Next Gen Systems Biology of RespirationU24HL148865 · NHLBI · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI Bruce J Aronow, Nathan G. Salomonis · 2019 to 2026
$12.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS U24 HL148865
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Indirect Immunofluorescence (IIF) stained Human Epithelial (HEp-2) cells are considered the gold standard for detecting autoimmune diseases. Accurate cell segmentation, though often viewed as an intermediary step to downstream tasks like classification, significantly enhances overall performance when executed with precision. In this study, we conduct a systematic literature review of HEp-2 cell segmentation techniques, identifying 28 key papers utilizing traditional image processing, machine learning classifiers, deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs), and generative adversarial network (GAN) frameworks. Building on these insights, we benchmark 17 CNN models without pretraining and 8 CNN models pretrained on ImageNet using both Frozen Encoder and Tunable Encoder strategies on the I3A dataset. Cross-validation (CV) and Benjamini-Hochberg (BH) significance correction were employed to ensure statistical rigor in model comparisons. Domain-Specific Pretraining (DSPT) experiments demonstrated performance improvements, particularly for underrepresented classes, while Data Augmentation strategies (DA-1 and DA-2) revealed distinct impacts across model categories. GAN-based segmentation experiments using the top-performing CNN architectures as generators within a Pix2Pix framework revealed performance degradation due to data limitations and adversarial training instabilities. Nonetheless, GANs displayed class-specific improvements in visual alignment of segmentation masks. Results were evaluated comprehensively across eight performance metrics, including Dice, IOU, Accuracy, Precision, Sensitivity, Specificity, AU-ROC and AU-PR. This work offers a robust benchmarking of state-of-the-art CNN, GAN, and Transformer-based models for HEp-2 cell segmentation, providing valuable insights for future research directions, including ensemble approaches, dynamic patch sampling, and diffusion models.

Indexed as

Deep LearningImage Processing, Computer-AssistedBenchmarkingFluorescent Antibody Technique, IndirectHumansNeural Networks, ComputerBenchmarkingCell segmentationData augmentationDeep learningGenerative adversarial networkHEp-2 cellsHybrid architectureStatistical significanceTransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID40288291
PMCPMC13264518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.