ArticleThe Journal of surgical research2025
Machine Learning to Predict Early Death Despite Pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Article in The Journal of surgical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Futility in adenosquamous pancreatic cancer.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- The place of advanced machine learning techniques in building pancreatic adenocarcinoma survival and recurrence prognosis models.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionAbout 25% of patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for right-sided pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) die within 1 y of diagnosis. These patients carry all the risks of significant morbidity with no survival advantage when compared to nonsurgical options. We aimed to determine if machine learning models have superior accuracy to traditional regression models at predicting futile surgery in patients with PDAC.
methodsWe analyzed data from patients in the National Cancer Database undergoing PD for PDAC between 2004 and 2020. PD was defined as futile if the patient died within 12 mo of cancer diagnosis. We trained predictive models using 80% of the dataset and 16 preoperative input variables. Models included logistic regression, multilayer perceptron, decision tree, random forest, and gradient boosting classifiers. Models were tested on a 20% test set using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and Brier scores.
resultsOf the 66,331 patients identified, 34,260 (51.7%) were men, with a median age of 67 y (interquartile range, 59 to 74 y). A total of 16,772 (25.3%) patients met the criteria for futile surgery. The gradient boosting model outperformed other models with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.689, followed by logistic regression (0.679), random forest (0.675), and decision tree (0.664). Key predictors of futile PD included advanced age (> 79 y), tumor size ≥ 4 cm, and poor differentiation. Neoadjuvant therapy was associated with lower futility risk.
conclusionsWe demonstrated the ability of machine learning models to predict the odds of futile PD with moderate accuracy. Although similar analyses are needed on more granular datasets, our study has important implications for shared decision-making and optimized care for patients with PDAC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.