ArticleEuropean journal of public health2025
Clustering of non-medical risk factors and the association with duration of social care in pregnant women in highly vulnerable circumstances.
Article in European journal of public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pregnancy can be considered a window of opportunity to help pregnant women optimize the circumstances they live in. Within the Mothers of Rotterdam study, pregnant women in highly vulnerable circumstances received standard social care or targeted social care to improve their circumstances. Women in this study had many combinations of non-medical risk factors contributing to their vulnerable circumstances. Here, the aim is to study the association between different combinations of non-medical risk factors and duration of care. Existing non-medical risk factors, assessed with a vulnerability checklist, were clustered using Latent Class Analysis (LCA). Linear regression was used to examine the relationship with duration of social care. The model was adjusted for maternal age, deprived neighbourhood, and type of social care. Four vulnerability classes were identified among 840 women and were labelled complex (9%), educational (24%), social network (12%), and financial vulnerability (55%). In the unadjusted model, all three classes showed a significant longer duration of social care compared to the financial vulnerability class. After adjustment, only the longer duration of care of the social network vulnerability class remained statistically significant. The four identified vulnerability classes illustrate that even within a group of women in highly vulnerable circumstances, subgroups of vulnerability exist. The vulnerability classes were identifiable through different combinations of non-medical risk factors and are all, associated with different durations of social care. These findings help to understand, and plan for, the requirements of social care for women in highly vulnerable circumstances.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.