Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40287937›Full record

Trial reportThe Prostate2025

Primary Analysis of (NCT03380806) a Phase II Randomized Trial of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Boost Versus Conventional Fractionation External Beam Radiotherapy Boost in Unfavorable-Intermediate and High-Risk Prostate Cancer.

Andre Gouveia, Aruz Mesci, Naghmeh Isfahanian, Ian Dayes, Kimmen Quan, Mira Goldberg, Kara Lynne Schnarr, Himu Lukka, David Cuthbert, Abhiram Hallock and 9 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase IIComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Prostate, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03380806 (A Randomized Phase II Trial Investigating Stereotactic Body RadioTherapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03380806 phase2unknown statusnot on this map

A Randomized Phase II Trial Investigating Stereotactic Body RadioTherapy (SBRT) for Prostate Boost Irradiation in the Treatment of High Risk Prostate Cancer (PrCa)

TypeinterventionalSponsorJuravinski Cancer CenterRan2019 to 2022Enrolled100ConditionsProstate CancerArmsLHRH agonist, Pelvic Radiation, Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT), Conventional Radiotherapy (CRT) Prostate Boost
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Interobserver variability in dominant intraprostatic lesion delineation usingReports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Andre GouveiaRadiation Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Science, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7055-3557
Aruz MesciRadiation Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Science, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Naghmeh IsfahanianRadiation Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Science, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Ian DayesRadiation Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Science, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Kimmen QuanRadiation Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Science, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Mira GoldbergRadiation Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Science, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Kara Lynne SchnarrRadiation Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Science, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Himu LukkaRadiation Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Science, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
David CuthbertRadiation Oncology, Walker Family Cancer Center, Niagara Health System, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada.
Abhiram HallockRadiation Oncology, Walker Family Cancer Center, Niagara Health System, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada.
Georgia DouviDepartment of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Jim WrightRadiation Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Science, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Anand SwaminathRadiation Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Science, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Tom ChowMedical Physics, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Science, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Kevin DiamondMedical Physics, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Science, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
George HajdokMedical Physics, Walker Family Cancer Center, Niagara Health System, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada.
Lindsay MaharajDepartment of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Joycelyne EwusieDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Theodoros TsakiridisRadiation Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Science, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

Funding for this trial was provided by Sanofi and Tolmar, Canada.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStandard treatment for unfavorable-intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer involves androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in combination with pelvic conventional fractionation (CF) external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and a CF-EBRT or brachytherapy boost to the prostate. This trial compared CF-EBRT boost with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) boost after pelvic CF-EBRT.

methodsPatients were randomized to receive a boost using either CF-EBRT (32-34 Gy in 15-17 fractions) or SBRT (19.5-21 Gy in three weekly fractions) following pelvic CF-EBRT (45-46 Gy in 23-25 fractions). The primary objective was to assess early (3-month post-radiotherapy) gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) quality of life (QoL), using the expanded prostate index composite (EPIC) score. Secondary objectives included long-term QoL, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) changes, toxicity assessments, and long-term disease control outcomes. Linear regression and Fisher's exact test were used for analysis.

resultsOf the 100 patients randomized, 53 received CF-EBRT, and 47 received SBRT. After a mean follow-up of 18.5 months, no significant differences were observed in EPIC score changes between CF-EBRT and SBRT at 3 months posttreatment for urinary (11.5 vs. 8.6, p = 0.23), bowel (5.2 vs. 6.4, p = 0.57), and overall QoL (8.3 vs. 7.5, p = 0.61). IPSS scores were similar (p = 0.11), and CTCAE v.5.0 toxicity rates were comparable, with an odds ratio of 0.90 (p > 0.99). Biochemical failure rates were under 5% for both groups.

conclusionsThis is the first randomized trial to report QoL outcomes after SBRT boost radiotherapy in patients with unfavorable-intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer. SBRT boost after pelvic CF-EBRT is well-tolerated and demonstrates comparable outcomes in QoL and toxicity to the CF-EBRT boost. Further follow-up is needed to assess the long-term effects on QoL, toxicity, and disease control.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03380806.

Indexed as

Prostatic NeoplasmsRadiosurgeryAgedAged, 80 and overBrachytherapyDose Fractionation, RadiationHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeADTboost radiotherapyhigh‐risk prostate cancerQoLSBRT

Identifiers

PMID40287937
PMCPMC12131954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.