ArticleInternational journal of clinical oncology2025
CD155 expression and co-expression with PD-L1 are not associated with poor prognosis in patients with stage II and III lung adenocarcinoma undergoing surgical resection.
Article in International journal of clinical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Role and clinical significance of VISTA (PD-1H) and PVR (CD155) expression in non-small cell lung carcinoma: a systematic review.Translational lung cancer research · 2026Review
- Expression and clinical significance of CD155, FGL1, Galectin-9, and PD‑L1 in breast cancer with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCD155 has been identified as a ligand for T-cell immunoreceptor with Ig and ITIM domains. Herein, we investigated the relationship between the expressions of CD155 and programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and clinical outcomes in patients with surgically resected lung adenocarcinoma.
methodsThis study included 426 patients diagnosed with pathological stage (pStage) I-III lung adenocarcinoma who underwent surgery at Kyushu University Hospital. The number of tumor cells expressing CD155 and PD-L1 was assessed by immunohistochemistry, and the clinical significance of CD155 expression and CD155/PD-L1 co-expression in prognosis was investigated.
resultsAmong the enrolled cohort, 320 (75.1%), 60 (14.1%), and 46 (10.8%) patients were diagnosed with pStage I, II, and III, respectively. Tissues from 112 patients (26.3%) were classified as having high CD155 expression. Co-expression of CD155 and PD-L1 was observed in 44 patients (10.3%). The High CD155 and CD155/PD-L1 co-expression groups had significantly poorer prognosis in pStage I-III lung adenocarcinoma. However, subgroup analysis revealed that the clinical significance of both CD155 expression and CD155/PD-L1 co-expression differed widely between patients with pStage I and II-III. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses showed that high CD155 expression and CD155/PD-L1 co-expression were not independent poor prognostic factors in pStage II-III lung adenocarcinoma.
conclusionOur findings suggest that neither CD155 expression or CD155/PD-L1 co-expression are associated with poor prognosis in pStage II-III lung adenocarcinoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40287900What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.