ReviewOphthalmology and therapy2025
Clinical Outcomes of Treatment of Geographic Atrophy: A Narrative Review.
Review in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- αB-crystallin elastin-like polypeptides for sustained ocular drug delivery.Drug delivery and translational research · 2026Article
- Restoration of Saccadic Eye Movements and Visually Guided Behavior in Ambient White Light with Photoswitchable Small Molecules.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2026Article
- Photobiomodulation in Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Mitochondrial Bioenergetic Framework and Translational Perspective.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Differentiation of macular atrophy secondary to neovascular age-related macular degeneration vs. de novo geographic atrophy: a multimodal analysis.Eye (London, England) · 2026Article
- Nrf2 Activated by PD-MSCs Attenuates Oxidative Stress in a Hydrogen Peroxide-Injured Retinal Pigment Epithelial Cell Line.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A Sulfated Polysaccharide fromMarine drugs · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
rationaleIn 2023, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved pegcetacoplan (SYFOVRE) as the first therapeutic option for geographic atrophy (GA), a previously untreatable condition associated with age-related macular degeneration. Following this, avacincaptad pegol (Izervay) was also approved for GA treatment, further expanding therapeutic options.
objectivesThis article aims to give an overview of the clinical outcomes of GA treatment and to discuss which patient groups may benefit most from these therapies.
methodsA review of the literature was conducted using the databases PubMed, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov. The search yielded six relevant studies.
conclusionsThe management of geographic atrophy has advanced with therapies like pegcetacoplan and avacincaptad pegol showing clear benefits in slowing lesion growth. However, safety concerns, such as neovascular complications, persist. Photobiomodulation and dietary supplementation provide alternative options with modest benefits, particularly in the early stages. Larger studies are needed to confirm long-term safety, efficacy, and optimal treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.