Trial reportLasers in medical science2025
A randomised comparative study of 1064 nm Nd:YAG laser and Urea occlusion therapy with topical miconazole for the treatment of onychomycosis.
Trial report in Lasers in medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Combination of Q-switched 1,064 and 532 nm Nd: YAG laser in the treatment of toenail onychomycosis: a pilot study.Lasers in medical science · 2025Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Onychomycosis is a chronic fungal infectious disease and its treatment remains quite challenging at present. We aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of 1064 nm Nd:YAG laser in the treatment of onychomycosis. In this study, patients were randomly divided into three groups: laser (L), urea occlusion (UO), laser combined with urea occlusion (L + UO). Group L was treated with 1064 nm Nd:YAG laser. Group UO was treated with urea encapsulation. Group L + UO was treated with urea encapsulation followed by laser. All patients received Miconazole nitrate cream twice a day. Follow-up was conducted at 12 and 24 weeks. The Scoring Clinical Index for Onychomycosis (SCIO) and mycological examination were conducted. The clinical efficacy was evaluated based on the SCIO scores and the "temporary clear nail increase rate". A total of 59 patients with 110 affected nails were initially enrolled. Two patients (5 nails) were lost to follow-up, leaving 57 patients and 105 nails that had completed follow-up. At 24 weeks, in Group L, Group UO, and Group L + UO, the SCIO response rates were 42.86%, 66.67%, and 61.11%, respectively, the "temporary clear nail increase rates" were 19.05%, 16.67%, and 47.22%, respectively, and the mycological cure rates were 26.52%, 53.33%, and 56.52%, respectively. The "temporary clear nail increase rate" between Group L and Group L + UO, and the average SCIO before and after treatment in three groups was statistically significant. In conclusion, the combination of 1064 nm Nd:YAG laser and UO is an effective treatment for onychomycosis, which is of great significance for improving the therapeutic efficacy of onychomycosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40287882What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.