ArticleAnnals of hematology2025
Molecular predictors of venous and arterial thrombotic events in patients with myelofibrosis.
Article in Annals of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Acute promyelocytic leukemia with a unique genetic signature: a case report and management.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Clonal Hematopoiesis (CHIP) in Pulmonary Embolism and CTEPH: Evidence, Mechanisms, and Risk Stratification.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Clinical and Molecular Insights of Arterial and Venous Thrombosis in Myeloproliferative Diseases-Case-Based Narrative Review.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Clear Cell Ovarian Carcinoma and Its Distinct Coagulopathy Profile: Molecular Drivers and Clinical Implications.Cancer management and research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While patients with myelofibrosis (MF) face an elevated risk of thrombosis, no validated scoring system currently exists to effectively assess this specific risk. This study aimed to explore distinct molecular risk factors for arterial (ATE) and venous (VTE) thrombosis in a cohort of 141 MF patients. Mutation analysis was performed by next-generation sequencing for a panel of 30 target myeloid genes as previously described: 137 driver and 164 non-driver mutations were detected. JAK2-V617F was identified in 77 (55%) patients, CALR in 45 (32%) patients, and seven (5%) patients carried an MPL variant. Patients #58 and #60 harbored JAK2-V617F and MPL; and patient #67 was positive for all three driver genes. The JAK2-V617F variant allele frequency (VAF) was assessed in 66/80 patients, revealing a median of 34.0% (range, 5.0-96.0). ASXL1 (n = 34 patients) were the most common non-driver mutations, followed by TET2 (n = 26), U2AF1 (n = 12), and DNMT3A (n = 11). During a median follow up of 4.8 years, 24 (17%) patients experienced VTE, 15 (11%) ATE, and two patients experienced both. Among the 24 patients with VTE, 12 (50%) experienced splanchnic vein thrombosis. The JAK2-V617F mutation was associated with VTE (OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.01-7.16), while the DNMT3A mutation was an independent predictor of ATE (OR 5.40, 95% CI 1.30-22.42). High JAK2-V617F VAF (> 50%) was not related with an increased thrombotic risk. Results of this study demonstrate the significance of DNMT3A mutations as an independent molecular risk factor for ATE, highlighting the potential to include these somatic non-driver mutations in future thrombosis risk scores.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.