SynthesisAnnals of hematology2025
Emerging treatment approaches for VEXAS syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Annals of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Atypical Presentation of VEXAS Syndrome Amid Coexisting Comorbidities: Diagnosis by High Depth Targeted Sequencing.International journal of rheumatic diseases · 2026Article
- VEXAS Syndrome: Clinical Features, Hematologic Involvement, and Clinical Outcomes of Current and Emerging Therapies.Hematology reports · 2026Review
- A fatal case of VEXAS syndrome with a brief review.Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2026Article
- Rapid cutaneous remission response to tofacitinib and systemic corticosteroids in VEXAS syndrome with a novel UBA1 mutation.JAAD case reports · 2026Article
- A Case of VEXAS Syndrome Initially Masked as Myelodysplastic Syndrome: Importance of Marrow Vacuolization and UBA1 Testing: A Case Report.The American journal of case reports · 2026Article
- Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for VEXAS syndrome: A review and a case report.Clinical hematology international · 2026Article
- UBA1 as a proteostasis-innate immunity checkpoint: lessons from vexas syndrome and therapeutic implications.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- A Vexing Diagnosis: ENT Presentation of Vacuoles, E1 Enzyme, X-linked, Autoinflammatory, Somatic (VEXAS) Syndrome.Cureus · 2025Article
- A cross-sectional survey on VEXAS syndrome: insights from a global expert panel.Clinical rheumatology · 2025Article
- VEXAS: A review of current understandings and emerging treatment strategies.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
VEXAS (vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, autoinflammatory, somatic) syndrome is a monogenic autoinflammatory disorder with significant morbidity and mortality. Numerous treatment options including azacitidine, JAK inhibitors, IL-6 inhibitors, anti-IL-1, and anti-TNF agents have been proposed. However, no consensus on optimal treatment algorithm has been reached. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of medical treatment options through a meta-analysis of existing data to help establish clearer guidelines for managing VEXAS. The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024590134). MEDLINE and EMBASE were screened from inception until March 2025. We included patients with VEXAS syndrome who received treatment with azacitidine, JAK inhibitors, IL-6 inhibitors, anti-IL-1, or anti-TNF agents. The primary outcome was the proportion of complete responders. Partial response and reported adverse events were also evaluated. A total of 16 studies and 367 patients with VEXAS syndrome were included. Concomitant myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) was reported in 149 (40.6%) patients. Azacitidine treatment resulted in complete and partial response in 67% [95% CI (0.56,0.77)] and in 73% [95% CI (0.64,0.82)] of cases, respectively. JAK inhibitors produced a complete response in 42% [95% CI (0.33,0.52)] and partial response in 79% [95% CI (0.71,0.87)]. IL-6 inhibitors led to a complete response in 24% [95% CI (0.15,0.32)] and partial response in 72% [95% CI (0.64,0.81)]. Adverse events were frequently observed. Azacitidine demonstrated significant efficacy in patients with MDS. JAK inhibitors and IL-6 inhibitors may also be viable treatment options. Prospective clinical trials are needed for further confirmation of the results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.