Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40287866›Full record

SynthesisAnnals of hematology2025

Emerging treatment approaches for VEXAS syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Berkay Kilic, Efe Sacin, Muhammet Kadir Tanin, Ozgur Can Kilinc, Serdal Ugurlu

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Annals of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. A fatal case of VEXAS syndrome with a brief review.Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Berkay KilicCerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-3804-9800
Efe SacinCerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-0927-4950
Muhammet Kadir TaninCerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-9928-1210
Ozgur Can KilincCerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-3941-2076
Serdal UgurluDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, 3409, Turkey. serdalugurlu@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9561-2282

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

VEXAS (vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, autoinflammatory, somatic) syndrome is a monogenic autoinflammatory disorder with significant morbidity and mortality. Numerous treatment options including azacitidine, JAK inhibitors, IL-6 inhibitors, anti-IL-1, and anti-TNF agents have been proposed. However, no consensus on optimal treatment algorithm has been reached. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of medical treatment options through a meta-analysis of existing data to help establish clearer guidelines for managing VEXAS. The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024590134). MEDLINE and EMBASE were screened from inception until March 2025. We included patients with VEXAS syndrome who received treatment with azacitidine, JAK inhibitors, IL-6 inhibitors, anti-IL-1, or anti-TNF agents. The primary outcome was the proportion of complete responders. Partial response and reported adverse events were also evaluated. A total of 16 studies and 367 patients with VEXAS syndrome were included. Concomitant myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) was reported in 149 (40.6%) patients. Azacitidine treatment resulted in complete and partial response in 67% [95% CI (0.56,0.77)] and in 73% [95% CI (0.64,0.82)] of cases, respectively. JAK inhibitors produced a complete response in 42% [95% CI (0.33,0.52)] and partial response in 79% [95% CI (0.71,0.87)]. IL-6 inhibitors led to a complete response in 24% [95% CI (0.15,0.32)] and partial response in 72% [95% CI (0.64,0.81)]. Adverse events were frequently observed. Azacitidine demonstrated significant efficacy in patients with MDS. JAK inhibitors and IL-6 inhibitors may also be viable treatment options. Prospective clinical trials are needed for further confirmation of the results.

Indexed as

Hereditary Autoinflammatory DiseasesAzacitidineHumansInterleukin-6 InhibitorsJanus Kinase InhibitorsMyelodysplastic SyndromesSkin Diseases, GeneticTumor Necrosis Factor InhibitorsAzacitidineInterleukin-6 InhibitorsJanus Kinase InhibitorsTumor Necrosis Factor InhibitorsAutoinflammatory diseasesAzacitidineBiological agentsJAK inhibitorsMyelodyplastic syndromeVEXAS

Identifiers

PMID40287866
PMCPMC12141402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.