ArticleNucleic acids research2025
Bimodal specificity of TF-DNA recognition in embryonic stem cells.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Nonconsensus flanking sequence of hundreds of base pairs around in vivo binding sites: statistical beacons for transcription factor scanning.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Transcription factors (TFs) bind genomic DNA regulating gene expression and developmental programs in embryonic stem cells (ESCs). Even though comprehensive genome-wide molecular maps for TF-DNA binding are experimentally available for key pluripotency-associated TFs, the understanding of molecular design principles responsible for TF-DNA recognition remains incomplete. Here, we show that binding preferences of key pluripotency TFs, such as Pou5f1 (Oct4), Smad1, Otx2, Srf, and Nanog, exhibit bimodality in the local GC-content distribution. Sequence-dependent binding specificity of these TFs is distributed across three major contributions. First, local GC-content is dominant in high-GC-content regions. Second, recognition of specific k-mers is predominant in low-GC-content regions. Third, short tandem repeats (STRs) are highly predictive in both low- and high-GC-content regions. In sharp contrast, the binding preferences of c-Myc are exclusively dominated by local GC-content and STRs in high-GC-content genomic regions. We demonstrate that the transition in the TF-DNA binding landscape upon ESC differentiation is regulated by the concentration of c-Myc, which forms a bivalent c-Myc-Max heterotetramer upon promoter binding, competing with key pluripotency factors such as Smad1. Finally, a direct interaction between c-Myc and key pluripotency factors is not required to achieve this transition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.