ArticleBMC palliative care2025
Effectiveness of a competency-based coordinator of advance care planning competency enhancement program: a mixed method.
Article in BMC palliative care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundClinical Ethics Support Services (CESS) improve health-care quality by systematically identifying and resolving ethical issues. CESS providers should be trained to understand patients' difficulties with existential issues and advocate on their behalf. This study evaluates the effectiveness of educational programs to enhance the competencies to solve ethical issues in clinical practice for CESS providers related to life-sustaining-treatment, based on Jonsen et al.'s "the four topics approach."
methodsThis is an explanatory sequential mixed-method study conducted in quantitative and qualitative phases. Participants included 52 life-sustaining medical workers at general hospitals. The participants were categorized into 24 experimental and 28 control groups, including nurses, social workers, and legal administrations. The program encompassed bioethics, end-of-life care, critical thinking, decision-making training through clinical ethics cases, role-playing, communication skills, and discussions. In the quantitative phase, a quasi-experimental study design with pre-test, intervention, and post-test was used. The program for experimental group was provided through 8 sessions spread across 4 weeks. The participants' experiences were explored through semi-structured interviews in the qualitative phase.
resultsAfter the education, the experimental and control groups differed significantly in critical thinking disposition, and hospice and palliative care knowledge. Participants acknowledged that critical thinking education improved their ability to analyze and evaluate clinical ethical dilemmas. DISCUSSION: The case-based, role-playing intervention effectively enhanced participants' communication and critical thinking skills concerning life-sustaining treatments. Participants highlighted the importance of ongoing education and professional development to maintain core knowledge and skills, aiming to enhance the quality of care for patients, families, and colleagues.
trial registrationThis study was retrospectively registered as a code (No: KCT0009687) in the Korean Clinical Trial Service on August 9, 2024.URL: https://cris.nih.go.kr/cris/search/detailSearch.do?seq=27805&status=5&seq_group=27805&search_page=M .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.