Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40287673›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2025

Fostering international mentorship and collaborations: evaluation of the Global Bridges program for early-career researchers in health care sciences.

Hanna Johansson, Sebastian Lindblom, Linda Timm, Paul A Gardiner, Christina H Opava, Ing-Mari Dohrn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hanna JohanssonDivision of Physiotherapy, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Alfred Nobels Allé 23, Huddinge, 14183, Sweden. hanna.johansson.1@ki.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3360-5447
Sebastian LindblomKarolinska University Hospital, Theme Women's Health and Allied Health Professionals, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3781-7615
Linda TimmDivision of Occupational Therapy, Department of Neurobiology Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5681-2644
Paul A GardinerSchool of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8072-2673
Christina H OpavaDivision of Physiotherapy, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Alfred Nobels Allé 23, Huddinge, 14183, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6738-4879
Ing-Mari DohrnDivision of Physiotherapy, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Alfred Nobels Allé 23, Huddinge, 14183, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2593-550X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Strategic Research Area Health Care Science was funded by the Swedish government to build strong research environments in 2008. This was assigned to Karolinska Institutet and Umeå University. A major initiative was the development of the Global Bridges program at Karolinska Institutet. The aim was to support junior researchers through mentoring and fostering international networks within health care sciences, as well as provide opportunity for them to cultivate long-lasting international collaborations essential for their careers. As participants, junior researchers were given the opportunity to invite an international scholar to Stockholm for a one-week intensive program consisting of seminars, individual mentoring sessions, and workshops. The Global Bridges program was organized six times between 2013 and 2022 with 48 junior researchers (94% women) at Karolinska Institutet and Umeå University, and 37 international scholars (68% women) from different higher education institutions in Africa, Asia, Australia, Europe, and North America. In this study, we used a mixed-method parallel design to evaluate whether the Global Bridges program had reached its intended objectives. A web-survey was sent out to all participating junior researchers and invited scholars and yielded a response rate of 71% and 83% respectively. The results indicated support for the academic development of junior researchers and that the individual components of the program were useful. Additionally, several collaborations had developed, resulting in peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and research projects. However, more support was deemed necessary to foster long-lasting collaborations among junior researchers - invited scholar dyads.

Indexed as

International CooperationMentoringMentorsResearch PersonnelCooperative BehaviorFemaleHumansMaleProgram EvaluationSwedenInternationalizationLearning (MeSH)Mentoring (MeSH)Social networking (MeSH)

Identifiers

PMID40287673
PMCPMC12032714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.