ArticleBMC medical education2025
Factors influencing value-based care application among medical students and postgraduate in Thailand.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe adoption of Value-Based Care (VBC) is essential for enhancing healthcare quality and efficiency, with implications for future healthcare delivery. The primary outcome of this study was to determine factors influencing the application of VBC principles among sixth-year medical students and postgraduate trainees in Thailand. Understanding these factors is essential for designing targeted educational interventions that prepare trainees for patient-centered healthcare practice.
methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study at the Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, involving 90 participants, including 51 postgraduate trainees and 39 sixth-year medical students. Participants completed a comprehensive online questionnaire assessing their VBC-related attitudes, perceptions, intentions, and applications. Data analysis included descriptive statistics, Spearman correlation, and multiple linear regression.
resultsDistinct differences in VBC application scores were evident between the two groups. Moderate associations were found between attitudes and perceptions (r = 0.44, p < 0.001), as well as between intentions and applications (r = 0.53, p < 0.001). Regression analysis identified family health history (β = 4.32, 95% CI: 0.69 to 7.94, p = 0.021) as a key predictor among sixth-year medical students, while financial security (β = 4.33, 95% CI: 1.69 to 6.97, p = 0.002) was significant for postgraduate trainees. Perception (β = 0.32, 95% CI: 0.10 to 0.54, p = 0.005) and intention (β = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.10 to 0.73, p = 0.011) were significant predictors for both groups, particularly among postgraduate trainees.
conclusionsThis study underscores the critical influence of personal and financial factors on VBC adoption among medical students and trainees. Integrating targeted educational strategies addressing these predictors could enhance VBC education, better preparing students for patient-centered healthcare practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.