ArticleBMC neurology2025
Characteristics of chronic subdural haematomas related to DOACs vs warfarin.
Article in BMC neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe aim of this study was to investigate the effects of anticoagulation with DOACs and warfarin on the characteristics of chronic subdural hematomas (CSDHs), specifically, the size of the hematomas, the presence of midline shift and the effect on consciousness levels, measured via the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS).
methodsA multi-centre retrospective case series analysis from January 2015 to May 2020 was conducted. Patients who were anticoagulated with DOACs and warfarin were of primary interest. The CSDH characteristics that were focussed on included the size of the CSDH, midline shift and GCS. Chi-squared analysis and independent t-tests were conducted for inter-variable analysis. Relative risk was also calculated.
resultsTwo thousand, six hundred seventy-five patients across two tertiary neurosurgical units referred with CSDHs were included in the analysis. 1799 patients were male (67.3%), with a mean age of 78.5 years. 905 patients (33.8%) were on antithrombotic therapy, with 298 patients (11.1%) on warfarin and 203 patients (7.6%) on DOACs. There were statistically significant associations between the type of antithrombotic medication and both midline shift and size of the CSDH (p < 0.0001), but not GCS (p = 0.1956). No significant difference in relative risk (RR) for impaired GCS was found between DOACs and warfarin (1.158 vs 1.174 respectively). Relative risk analysis revealed a safer profile for DOACs, with a lower risk of developing a larger sized hematoma (RR 0.887 v 1.021) and a reduced likelihood of midline shift (RR 0.858 VS 0.938), which was supported by effect size analysis using odd's ratios. Comparative risk analysis between DOACs and warfarin further demonstrated a higher risk of midline shift for patients on warfarin (RR 1.431), that trended towards statistical significance (p = 0.0511, 95% confidence interval 0.998-2.05).
conclusionsFor CSDH patients, DOACs may potentially be a safer method of anticoagulation as opposed to warfarin as they appear to be linked to the development of smaller sized hematomas and reduced midline shift, although there was no significant difference in GCS between the groups. These features are known to reduce the risk of needing neurosurgical intervention for CSDH. This is important in influencing the management of an increasingly ageing, multi-morbid population on increasing amounts of anticoagulation medication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.