ArticleBMC public health2025
Long-term trends in the global burden of maternal abortion and miscarriage from 1990 to 2021: joinpoint regression and age-period-cohort analysis.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unravelling Multilayered RNA Modification Networks in Female Reproduction and Obstetric/Gynaecologic Disorders.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Analysis of Disease Burden and Future Trend Prediction for Iron Deficiency-Induced Abortion and Miscarriage in BRICS Countries.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- Risk assessment of drug-associated miscarriage using XGBoost and SHAP explainability: a real-world pharmacovigilance analysis based on the FAERS database.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMaternal abortion and miscarriage are significant contributors to the global burden of maternal health conditions. Iron deficiency remains a critical risk factor, significantly impacting reproductive health outcomes, particularly in low socio-demographic index (SDI) regions. This study aims to assess long-term trends in the incidence, mortality, and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) of maternal abortion and miscarriage from 1990 to 2021 using the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2021. Additionally, we evaluate the role of iron deficiency as a risk factor and project future burden estimates up to 2051.
methodsUtilizing the GBD 2021 dataset across 204 countries and territories, the study retrospectively analyzed long-term trends in maternal abortion and miscarriage from 1990 to 2021. Joinpoint regression was applied to identify temporal trends in age-standardized incidence rate (ASIR), age-standardized mortality rate (ASMR), and age-standardized DALYs rate (ASDR). An age-period-cohort (APC) model was used to assess the independent effects of age, period, and cohort, while future projections were generated using Bayesian age-period-cohort (BAPC) modeling.
resultsIn 2021, the global ASIR of maternal abortion and miscarriage was 1001.64 per 100,000 population (95% UI: 775.97-1261.67), with the highest burden in low SDI regions (ASIR = 1715.1 per 100,000 population). The ASMR, reflecting maternal mortality due to abortion and miscarriage, was 0.42 per 100,000 population (95% UI: 0.36-0.52). The ASDR, capturing the total burden including both premature mortality and disability, was 25.73 per 100,000 population (95% UI: 21.82-31.02). The global ASIR declined at an annual percentage change (APC) of -2.32% from 1990 to 1994 and by -2.00% from 2015 to 2019.
conclusionThe global burden of maternal abortion and miscarriage has decreased, with iron deficiency remaining a critical risk factor in low SDI regions, particularly among women aged 20-34. Projections suggest declines in ASIR over the next 30 years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.