ArticleScientific reports2025
Chemometric and computational modeling of polysaccharide coated drugs for colonic drug delivery.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence-assisted design and optimization of stimuli-responsive nanocarriers for smart drug delivery.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Predictive modeling of controlled drug release from polysaccharide-based systems using gradient boosting and metaheuristic optimization.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Combination of machine learning and Raman spectroscopy for prediction of drug release in targeted drug delivery formulations.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Implementing partial least squares and machine learning regressive models for prediction of drug release in targeted drug delivery application.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A methodology based on Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and machine learning (ML) regression was developed in this study for predicting 5-aminosalicylic acid drug release from polysaccharide-coated formulation. The Raman method was used for collection of spectral data which were then used as inputs to the ML models for estimation of drug release. For ML modeling, we examined the predictive accuracy of three machine learning models-Elastic Net (EN), Group Ridge Regression (GRR), and Multilayer Perceptron (MLP)-for forecasting the release behavior of samples. The dataset, consisting of 155 data points with over 1500 spectral features, underwent preprocessing involving normalization, Principal Component Analysis (PCA) for dimensionality reduction, and outlier detection using Cook's Distance. Model hyperparameters were tuned using the Slime Mould Algorithm (SMA), and each model's performance was evaluated through k-fold cross-validation (k = 3). Assessment metrics, such as the coefficient of determination (R²), root mean square error (RMSE), and mean absolute error (MAE), emphasize the MLP model's exceptional performance. On the test set, MLP achieved an R² of 0.9989, notably higher than EN's R² of 0.9760 and GRR's R² of 0.7137. Additionally, MLP exhibited remarkably low test RMSE and MAE values at 0.0084 and 0.0067, respectively, in comparison to EN's RMSE of 0.0342 and MAE of 0.0267, as well as GRR's RMSE of 0.0907 and MAE of 0.0744. Parity plots and learning curves further validate MLP's predictive reliability, demonstrating close alignment between actual and predicted values and efficient learning with minimal overfitting. Consequently, the MLP model emerges as the most effective approach for this predictive task, offering a robust tool for accurately modeling complex spectral data. These findings underscore the robustness of the MLP model, providing a reliable and efficient approach for predicting drug release in polysaccharide-coated formulations, with implications for advancing colonic drug delivery systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.