Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40287569›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2025

A neurally constrained computational model of context-dependent fear extinction recall and relapse.

Shreya K Rajagopal, Thad A Polk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shreya K RajagopalUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. shreyara@umich.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-3459-7554
Thad A PolkUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1634-8090

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exposure therapy, a standard treatment for anxiety disorders, relies on fear extinction. However, extinction recall is often limited to the spatial and temporal context in which extinction is learned, leading to fear relapse in new settings or after delays. Animal studies offer insights into fear extinction in humans. Computational models that integrate these findings into a neurally grounded framework, while generating testable hypotheses for humans, can bridge this gap. Current models either focus on neuron-level activity, limiting their scope, or abstract away entirely from neural mechanisms. They also often overlook the distinct contributions of cue and context in fear extinction and recall. To address these gaps, we present ConFER, a neurally constrained model of fear extinction, recall, and relapse. ConFER integrates findings from the neural fear circuit, modeling distinct pathways for cue and context processing. These pathways independently activate positive and/or negative memory engrams in the basolateral amygdala, competing to determine the fear response. ConFER simulates fear renewal and spontaneous recovery across context combinations, while generating novel, testable predictions. Notably, it predicts counterconditioning may better prevent relapse than extinction in new contexts or after delays. By mechanistically modeling fear relapse, ConFER offers insights to improve exposure therapy outcomes.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationExtinction, PsychologicalFearMental RecallModels, NeurologicalAnimalsHumansRecurrence

Identifiers

PMID40287569
PMCPMC12033332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.