Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40287568›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2025

The RoDEM benchmark: evaluating the robustness of monocular single-shot depth estimation methods in minimally-invasive surgery.

Rasoul Sharifian, Navid Rabbani, Adrien Bartoli

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rasoul Sharifian *DIA2M, DRCI, CHU, Clermont-Ferrand, France. rasoul.sharifian.cs@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7254-7118
Navid Rabbani *DIA2M, DRCI, CHU, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Adrien BartoliDIA2M, DRCI, CHU, Clermont-Ferrand, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMonocular Single-shot Depth Estimation (MoSDE) methods for Minimally-Invasive Surgery (MIS) are promising but their robustness in surgical conditions remains questionable. We introduce the RoDEM benchmark, comprising an advanced analysis of perturbations, a dataset acquired in realistic MIS conditions and metrics. The dataset consists of 29,803 ex-vivo images including 44 video sequences with depth Ground-Truth covering clean conditions and nine perturbations. We give the performance evaluation of nine existing MoSDE methods.

methodsAn RGB-D structured-light camera was firmly attached to a laparoscope. The two cameras were internally calibrated and the rigid transformation between them was estimated. Synchronised images and videos were captured while producing real perturbations in three settings. The depth maps were eventually transferred to the laparoscope viewpoint and the images categorised by perturbation severity.

resultsThe proposed metrics cover accuracy (clean condition performance) and robustness (resilience to perturbations). We found that foundation models demonstrated higher accuracy than the other methods. All methods were robust to motion blur and bright light. Methods trained on large datasets were robust against smoke, blood, and low light whereas the other methods exhibited reduced robustness. None of the methods coped with lens dirtiness and defocus blur.

conclusionThis study highlighted the importance of robustness evaluation in MoSDE as many existing methods showed reduced accuracy against common surgical perturbations. It emphasises the importance of training with large datasets including perturbations. The proposed benchmark gives a precise and detailed analysis of a method's performance in the MIS conditions. It will be made publicly available.

Indexed as

Imaging, Three-DimensionalLaparoscopyMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresBenchmarkingHumansVideo RecordingMinimally-invasive surgeryMonocular depth estimationRobustness

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.