ArticleScientific reports2025
Metabolomic signatures of cognitive function in a type 2 Diabetes-Enriched cohort.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To understand the relationship between type 2 diabetes (T2D) and risk for developing cognitive impairment, this study is the first to examine association between metabolites measured at mid-life and cognitive performance assessed later in life (8-10 years) in a T2D-enriched cohort. The discovery set included metabolomics from European Americans (EAs; n = 137) and African Americans (AAs; n = 134) from the Diabetes Heart Study (DHS) and the African American-DHS (AA-DHS). The cognitive testing battery included measures of executive function, memory, attention, language, and global cognition. Ancestry-specific linear regression analyses were performed and a false discovery rate (FDR)-corrected p-value was used to assess significance. Overall, fewer significant metabolites were associated with cognitive performance in AAs (n = 19) as compared to EAs (n = 118) suggesting racial differences. There was a positive association between sphingomyelins and cognitive performance, consistent with prior reports. Novel findings implicated partially characterized metabolites linked to oxidative breakdown of bilirubin to multiple cognitive domains suggesting further exploration of this class of metabolites towards improving pathophysiologic understanding and early intervention. Cross-ancestry replication identified four metabolites that generalized to both populations. Replication was performed among additional study participants, i.e. 421 EAs and 167 AAs, followed by a formal meta-analysis. Replication bolstered the association of multiple metabolites with cognitive function. Among these, cortisol was associated in AAs suggesting a link between stress and risk for reduced cognitive function. Further work is needed to provide insight into the pathophysiologic mechanisms and highlight metabolites for inclusion in risk stratification models of cognitive performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.