Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40287546›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Ptychographic reconstructions performed in real time and offline have equivalent quality.

Rebecka Lexelius, Maik Kahnt, Filipe R N C Maia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rebecka LexeliusLaboratory of Molecular Biophysics, Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University, Husargatan 3 (Box 596), 75124, Uppsala, Sweden.
Maik KahntMAX IV Laboratory, Lund University, 22100, Lund, Sweden. maik.kahnt@maxiv.lu.se.
Filipe R N C MaiaLaboratory of Molecular Biophysics, Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University, Husargatan 3 (Box 596), 75124, Uppsala, Sweden. filipe.maia@icm.uu.se.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ptychography is a burgeoning imaging technique that enables high-resolution, lensless reconstruction of complex samples by analysing overlapping diffraction patterns, making it invaluable in fields like materials science, biology, and nanotechnology. Real-time ptychographic reconstructions are gaining interest in the scientific community as they provide immediate feedback. Yet their potential to replace offline reconstructions remains uncertain, in part due to questions about the quality of the resulting images. This study quantitatively compares real-time and offline reconstructions at different overlap conditions. Offline reconstructions, using all diffraction patterns at once, and real-time reconstructions, where new frames are added to the reconstructions in small chunks as the diffraction patterns are recorded, were indistinguishable and identical in reconstruction quality. These results hold consistently across all tested overlap ratios. This study represents the first quantitative analysis of real-time ptychographic reconstruction using a growing dataset, demonstrating the potential for real-time reconstructions to replace or at least complement offline reconstructions.

Identifiers

PMID40287546
PMCPMC12033293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.