ArticleScientific reports2025
Comparable neural and behavioural performance in dominant and non-dominant hands during grasping tasks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Time-Dependent Enhancement of Motor Dexterity and Cerebellar Function via Premotor-Cerebellar Associative Stimulation.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Article
- Directional Asymmetry of Crossover Neuromuscular Fatigue Following Unilateral Handgrip Exercise in Adults and Prepubertal Children.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- One third of people exert greater handgrip strength with their non-dominant hand.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hand dominance has long been associated with differences in neural control and motor performance, with the dominant hand typically exhibiting better coordination in reaching tasks. However, the extent to which this dominance influences performance in finger force control remains unclear. This study aimed to examine the behavioural and neural features of the dominant and non-dominant hands during grasping and lifting tasks in healthy young adults, focusing on the synergy index, EEG band power, and EEG-EMG coherence as key measures. Twenty right-handed adults participated in this study. Participants engaged in an experimental task where they grasped a handle for the initial 5 s, followed by lifting and holding it for an additional 5 s. There were two task conditions: fixed (thumb platform secured) and free (thumb platform movable). It was hypothesized that the dominant hand would exhibit greater finger force coordination and enhanced neural features, including higher EEG band power and increased EEG-EMG coherence, compared to the non-dominant hand. Contrary to the hypothesis, we found statistical equivalence in the synergy index, EEG band power, and EEG-EMG coherence between the dominant and non-dominant hands across both fixed and free task conditions. These findings suggest that both hands can achieve similar levels of performance in tasks emphasizing steady-state force maintenance, despite the typical advantages of the dominant hand in other motor tasks. However, a significant difference was observed between task conditions, with the fixed condition showing higher values than the free condition in both behavioural (synergy index-η
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.