ArticleScientific reports2025
Control of three-level quadratic DC-DC boost converters for energy systems using various technique-based MPPT methods.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The conventional DC-DC architecture is often used in photovoltaic systems, with control based on incremental conductance-based maximum power point tracking (MPPT-IC) algorithms. Despite its simplicity and ability to ensure voltage balance across the output capacitors, this architecture suffers several drawbacks. These drawbacks cause undesirable problems such as high power ripples, overshoot, and limited dynamic response. Therefore, this paper proposes a three-level quadratic DC-DC boost converter as a suitable solution to replace conventional inverters in photovoltaic systems, while combined with an advanced MPPT method. The new approach is MPPT based on NARX neural network (NARAX-NN) algorithms. This proposed strategy is designed for high accuracy, robustness, and fast dynamic response compared to the MPPT-IC strategy. In this work, the MPPT-NARX-NN strategy of a three-level quadratic DC-DC boost converter is compared with several different strategies (MPPT-IC, MPPT based on type 1 fuzzy logic (MPPT-T1FL), and MPPT based on type 2 fuzzy logic (MPPT-T2FL)). This comparison is performed using MATLAB under different operating conditions. Simulation results indicate that the MPPT-NARX-NN approach significantly improves the operational performance of a three-level quadratic DC-DC boost converter compared to other strategies, increasing the reliability and deployment of photovoltaic systems. The numerical results show that the MPPT-NARX-NN strategy improves the rise time by 96.43, 97.34, and 94.50% compared to MPPT-IC, MPPT-T1FL, and MPPT-T2FL, respectively. Also, the settling time is improved by 50, 66.66, and 6.66% compared to MPPT-IC, MPPT-T1FL, and MPPT-T2FL, respectively. Furthermore, the strategy increases the average tracking efficiency (%) by 3.86 and 1.12% for MPPT-IC and MPPT-T1FL, respectively. These results highlight the effectiveness of the three-level quadratic DC-DC boost converter based on the MPPT-NARX-NN strategy in extracting energy, increasing performance and flexibility, and improving system reliability, making solar PV systems more efficient and a promising and indispensable solution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.