Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40287514›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A novel XbaI multiplex PCR method for rapid typing of Klebsiella pneumoniae strains.

Ibrahim Ali Al-Zahrani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ibrahim Ali Al-ZahraniMedical Laboratory Sciences Department, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, P.O Box 80324, 21589, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. iaalzahrani1@kau.edu.sa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3879-5833

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study focused on exploiting single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) variations in and around XbaI-restriction sites (5'….T↓CTAGA….3') within the genomes of Klebsiella pneumoniae to develop a multiplex PCR genotyping technique that integrates the high discrimination of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) with the straightforwardness of a multiplex PCR-based procedure, for routine use in clinical laboratories. The XbaI-multiplex PCR method was evaluated in silico using 10 reference strains and subsequently compared to PFGE and MLST, revealing similar clustering patterns of test strains in most cases. Furthermore, 29 clinical isolates with known sequence types (STs) were analysed ed using XbaI-multiplex PCR, which demonstrated acceptable discriminative ability and relative concordance with MLST results. Like other PCR-based typing methods, the XbaI-multiplex PCR method is not only cost-effective but also user-friendly as it does not necessitate the use of complex instruments or specialized skills, and results are available within 4-6 h. Its implementation relies on standard clinical laboratory instruments, such as a PCR machine and agarose gel electrophoresis. However, the XbaI-multiplex PCR still requires further evaluations with a larger number of clinical isolates, including K. pneumoniae isolates obtained from hospital outbreaks.

Indexed as

Bacterial Typing TechniquesKlebsiella pneumoniaeMultiplex Polymerase Chain ReactionElectrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-FieldGenotypeHumansKlebsiella InfectionsMultilocus Sequence TypingPolymorphism, Single NucleotideCarbapenem-resistant enterobacteralesKlebsiella pneumoniaeMolecular epidemiologyXbaI-multiplex PCR genotyping

Identifiers

PMID40287514
PMCPMC12033266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.