ArticleScientific reports2025
A novel XbaI multiplex PCR method for rapid typing of Klebsiella pneumoniae strains.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study focused on exploiting single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) variations in and around XbaI-restriction sites (5'….T↓CTAGA….3') within the genomes of Klebsiella pneumoniae to develop a multiplex PCR genotyping technique that integrates the high discrimination of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) with the straightforwardness of a multiplex PCR-based procedure, for routine use in clinical laboratories. The XbaI-multiplex PCR method was evaluated in silico using 10 reference strains and subsequently compared to PFGE and MLST, revealing similar clustering patterns of test strains in most cases. Furthermore, 29 clinical isolates with known sequence types (STs) were analysed ed using XbaI-multiplex PCR, which demonstrated acceptable discriminative ability and relative concordance with MLST results. Like other PCR-based typing methods, the XbaI-multiplex PCR method is not only cost-effective but also user-friendly as it does not necessitate the use of complex instruments or specialized skills, and results are available within 4-6 h. Its implementation relies on standard clinical laboratory instruments, such as a PCR machine and agarose gel electrophoresis. However, the XbaI-multiplex PCR still requires further evaluations with a larger number of clinical isolates, including K. pneumoniae isolates obtained from hospital outbreaks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.