Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40287510›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Expanding the V1-MT model to the estimation of perceived fluid direction.

Takahiro Kawabe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Takahiro KawabeNTT Communication Science Laboratories, 3-1, Morinosato Wakamiya, Atsugi, Kanagawa, 243-0198, Japan. takahiro.kawabe@ntt.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans can readily perceive the direction of liquid flow, yet computational modeling of this process remains challenging due to the complexity of non-rigid motion. Previous models based on neural activities in the primary visual cortex (V1) and the middle temporal area (MT) have been effective in explaining rigid motion perception. In this study, we extend the V1-MT model to address the perception of liquid flow direction. Participants observed video clips of liquid flow and reported the perceived direction, while the V1-MT model was used to predict these perceptions. The winner-take-all approach failed to accurately capture the observed perceptions. In contrast, a weighted mean of directional energies yielded strong predictions, highlighting that the human visual system spatially integrates directional energies from non-rigid motion components. These findings broaden the applicability of the V1-MT model to non-rigid motion and provide insights into how the visual system bridges the gap between computational models of rigid and non-rigid motion perception.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalMotion PerceptionPrimary Visual CortexTemporal LobeVisual CortexAdultComputer SimulationFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationYoung AdultLiquid flow directionMotionV1-MT modelWeighted average

Identifiers

PMID40287510
PMCPMC12033300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.