ArticleScientific reports2025
Merging microencapsulated garlic extract as a bioactive ingredient into manufacturing functional soft cheese.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The study aimed to produce a functional soft cheese with garlic extract (GE). First, the GE was encapsulated using gum Arabic (GA) and whey protein isolate, and its characteristics [zeta-potential, particle size, Coacervates yield, Encapsulation efficiency and polydispersity index, scanning electron microscope (SEM)] were evaluated. The free GE (FGE) and encapsulated GE (EGE) were then added to UF-soft cheese formulation (0.2 and 0.4% w/w). The samples were kept for 30 days in a refrigerator and their physicochemical, sensory properties, Texture profile, SEM and radical-scavenging activity were examined. EGE UF-soft cheese exhibited more free-radical scavenging activity than FGE at the same concentration and control, 25.14, 22.12, and 13.64%, respectively. The EGE-fortified cheese had a harder and gummier texture, a more noticeable change than the FGE and control cheese. In comparison to FGE-fortified and control, the sensory attribute representing overall quality, especially that fortified with 0.2% EGE displays the highest value. The study demonstrates that the use of EGE in cheese fortification provides a healthy and promising approach to reducing the strong flavor of garlic and enhancing bioactivity in the production of functional soft cheese, offering up novel opportunities for the development of distinctive dairy products with functional features.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.