Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40287489›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A hybrid gazelle optimization and reptile search algorithm for optimal clustering in wireless sensor networks.

Soha S Elashry, A S Abohamama, Hatem Mohamed Abdul-Kader, M Z Rashad, Ahmed F Ali

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Soha S ElashryDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Computers and Information, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
A S AbohamamaDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Computers and Information, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Hatem Mohamed Abdul-KaderDepartment of Information System, Faculty of Computers and Information, Menofia University, Shebien El Koum, Egypt.
M Z RashadDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Computers and Information, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Ahmed F AliFaculty of Information Technology and Computer Science, Sinai University, Kantara, Egypt. ahmed_fouad@ci.suez.edu.eg.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In our modern societies, the wireless sensor network (WSN) is categorized as a smart motivated technology that can be utilized in many work environments and activities to enhance daily life. However, several challenging concerns have been assigned to WSN. The clustering process is a main complex concern and still an open problem in WSN. To support an efficient clustering process, two crucial requirements must be considered, energy management and network lifetime extension, especially in the development of large-scale WSN. The primary objective of this article is to introduce a new meta-heuristic algorithm, denoted as the hybrid gazelle optimization and reptile search algorithm (HGORSA), which optimizes cluster head selection in WSNs. In the proposed algorithm, the mathematical models for the exploration and exploitation phases of the traditional gazelle optimization algorithm (GOA) are enhanced by integrating the hunting operator, reduction function, and predator cumulative effect operators from the traditional RSA. These modifications improve the balance between diversification and intensification processes, effectively addressing two key clustering requirements mentioned above. At the same time, they also positively impact the overall performance evaluation of the WSN. Various simulation scenarios are designed to evaluate the performance of the proposed HGORSA in different network configurations. First, the main experiment was conducted with 300 sensor nodes (SNs). The experimental results then analyzed to assess the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm under different conditions against six state-of-the-art meta-heuristic algorithms. Based on simulation outputs, HGORSA demonstrated superior performance compared to particle swarm optimization, grey Wolf optimizer, sperm swarm optimization, chernobyl disaster optimizer, gazelle optimization algorithm and reptile search algorithm. Specifically, HGORSA achieved percentage improvements in terms of stability period (37.3%, 49.6%, 46.8%, 55.3%, 19.1%, and 34.4%, respectively), energy consumption (10.8%, 10.5%, 9.6%, 8.6%, 8.3%, and 3.5%, respectively), network lifetime (44.5%, 40.8%, 23.8%, 16.8%, 9.3%, and 7.2%, respectively), reduction in number of dead nodes (30.3%, 29.7%, 28.9%, 24.3%, 18%, and 11.5%, respectively), and network throughput (36.4%, 43.9%, 34.2%, 25%, 20%, 14.4%, respectively). Moreover, a supplementary experiment was conducted to test the efficiency of the HGORSA algorithm in dense and sparse networks, where the number of SNs was set at 50 and 500. The algorithm was evaluated based on the five standard aforementioned performance metrics. Furthermore, the robustness of HGORSA was validated using statistical measures, including standard deviation (Std), average (Avg), worst and best values, and box plots of the fitness function across 20 independent runs. Based on statistical results, HGORSA outperformed the other comparative meta-heuristics.

Indexed as

ClusteringEnergy consumptionGazelle Optimization Algorithm (GOA)Meta-heuristicsNetwork lifetimeReptile Search Algorithm (RSA)Wireless sensor network (WSN)

Identifiers

PMID40287489
PMCPMC12033330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.