ArticleScientific reports2025
Experimental and numerical study of tubular steel columns with/without demountable bolted shear connectors embedded in the concrete.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Experimental and numerical investigation on basaltic soil under RC square footings.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Numerical assessment of failure load and soil-footing contact stress distribution for concrete foundations on cohesionless soil.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A numerical assignment on local pressure capacity of the concrete under the head of straight anchor bolts.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Numerical investigation on performance of concrete-steel composite beams incorporating multi-transverse holes.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Using Strain-Hardening Cement-based Composites (SHCC) reinforced with steel meshes for strengthening concrete bearing strength.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Effect of column and pile configuration and dimension on shear performance of reinforced concrete pile caps.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Three push-out specimens were experimentally tested to investigate the behavior of tubular steel columns (TSC) with and without bolted shear connectors embedded in normal concrete (NC). Each specimen consisted of a tubular steel column (TSC) encased in a 250 × 250 × 200 mm concrete cube The embedment/the prominent height of TSC was 100 mm. Foam was used underneath the TSC to form free space. The study considered variables such as the presence of demountable shear studs and reinforcement. The failure modes, load-slip response, peak load/slip, and shear stiffness of the specimens were analyzed. Furthermore, a finite element model (FEM) was developed using ABAQUS software to simulate the behavior of the tested specimens and validated against the experimental results. The FEM was also employed to conduct further parametric investigations. The results indicate that demountable shear studs significantly improve shear capacity, with specimens exhibiting a 217% higher peak load than those without studs. Reinforcing the concrete block had a negligible effect on peak load but increased peak slip by 37.7% and shear stiffness by 18.7% compared to the unreinforced specimen. Furthermore, increasing the TSC thickness significantly enhances peak load, with a 154.31% increase observed as the thickness increases from one-third of the bolt diameter to the full bolt diameter. Additionally, using TSC thicknesses greater than half the bolt diameter helps prevent bearing failure. Increasing the concrete compressive strength from 25 to 50 MPa leads to a 24.6% increase in peak load, while slip capacity decreases by 19.77%. For applications requiring high ductility, excessively high-strength concrete should be avoided, as it reduces slip capacity. The results also demonstrate that the bolt diameter should not exceed twice the TSC web thickness to prevent bearing failure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.