ArticleScientific reports2025
Integration of the reptile search algorithm and the adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system enhances standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index forecasting.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A novel metaheuristic algorithm called the reptile search algorithm (RSA) was introduced in conjunction with artificial neural fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) for the estimation of standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index (SPEI). The model was tested in three different climates: arid and super-cold, semi-arid and cold, and semi-arid and moderate climate across Iran by combining meteorological indices (minimum temperature, maximum temperature, average temperature, precipitation, and potential evapotranspiration) and large-scale climate signals (North Atlantic Oscillation, Arctic Oscillation, Pacific Decadal Oscillation, and Southern Oscillation Index). The results of the ANFIS + RSA model were compared with those of the ANFIS + WOA and ANFIS + GWO models for evaluation. Based on the estimation results and error evaluation criteria, the performance of the ANFIS + RSA model is considered appropriate, showing a higher relative accuracy compared to ANFIS, ANFIS + GWO, and ANFIS + WOA. In semi-arid and moderate climates, the ANFIS + RSA model exhibited the highest prediction accuracy, with RMSE = 0.28, MAE = 0.20, CA = 0.19, and NASH = 0.91. In semi-arid and cold climates, the model's accuracy was slightly lower, with RMSE = 0.33, MAE = 0.23, CA = 0.23, and NASH = 0.85. In arid and super-cold climates, the model's accuracy remained relatively consistent, with RMSE = 0.24, MAE = 0.18, CA = 0.19, and NASH = 0.84. Furthermore, the promising results of the hybrid ANFIS + RSA model can be further evaluated in other regions and climates to assess its overall effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.