ArticleScientific reports2025
A novel mathematical framework for pedigree-based calculation of Y-STR match probabilities.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Forensic genetics in the omics era.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Y-chromosomal short tandem repeat (Y-STR) markers are routinely used in forensic casework to identify male donors of biological traces left at crime scenes, particularly in sexual assault cases. However, the evidential value of a match between the Y-STR profile of a trace and a potential donor, usually a crime suspect, is difficult to quantify, and the common albeit inappropriate practise to equate Y-STR match probabilities with Y-STR profile frequencies estimated from population databases has been subject to scientific debate for decades. As a solution to this long-standing problem, we suggest an alternative approach to the calculation of Y-STR match probabilities that involves splitting the group of potential donors other than the suspect into two: (i) his close male relatives (termed his 'pedigree') and (ii) all other males. While an upper limit to the match probability is easily calculated for the second group, it is computationally challenging to derive for the first. We therefore developed a mathematical framework that uses importance sampling to reconstruct and evaluate the Y-STR profiles of untyped members of the suspect's pedigree by way of simulation. Extensive testing with elementary pedigrees of different structure and complexity confirmed that both, the framework and its Python-based software implementation yield match probability estimates that approximate well the correct analytical results, depending upon the number of simulations performed. Our methodology thus facilitates a more appropriate and valid solution to the long-standing problem of interpreting Y-STR profile matches in forensic casework.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.