ArticleScientific reports2025
Post-integration based point-line feature visual SLAM in low-texture environments.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- RGB-D SLAM: A Review of Methods and Performance Trade-Offs for Different Requirements.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To address the issues of weak robustness and low accuracy of traditional SLAM data processing algorithms in weak texture environments such as low light and low contrast, this paper first studies and improves the data feature extraction method, optimizing the AGAST-based feature extraction algorithm to adaptively adjust the extraction threshold according to the gradient size of different data features. Meanwhile, a fusion-based incremental loop closure detection method is proposed, which integrates the similarity scores of multi-dimensional data features based on the Borda counting strategy, thereby enhancing the accuracy of loop closure detection. The performance of loop closure detection was evaluated on public datasets (such as KITTI sequences 00, 05, and 06), achieving an average AP value of 92.03%. The overall system performance was evaluated on the EuRoC dataset, with the results showing a root mean square error range from 0.0061 to 0.0281 m, demonstrating the excellent accuracy and robustness of the proposed method in large-scale data processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.