ArticleScientific reports2025
ALBI-sarcopenia score as a predictor of treatment outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decoding the mechanistic basis of liver-muscle communication in health and disease.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Review
- Construction and Validation of a Predictive Model for Post-TACE Recurrence Risk in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2026Article
- Association between albumin-bilirubin score and sarcopenia in middle-aged Americans: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The recently developed ALBI-Sarcopenia score has demonstrated effectiveness in predicting mortality in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), emerging as a crucial factor in guiding treatment decisions. To assess the utility of the ALBI-Sarcopenia score in predicting the success of HCC treatment. A prospective study involving 262 liver cirrhosis with HCC patients were assigned to various treatment strategies according to Barcelona clinics of liver disease (BCLC) classification. Patients were followed up for 12 months reporting laboratory data, sarcopenia, ALBI-Sarcopenia score, and outcomes. Sarcopenia was prevalent in 43.1% (48.35% males and 31.25% females, P = 0.042). Most patients were HCV-positive (88.9%) and classified as CTP A (55.7%) or BCLC B (54.2%). Over the study period, TACE was the most administered treatment (41.2% at baseline), followed by a progressive shift toward best supportive care as disease severity increased. Complete response rates declined from 31.7% at 1 month to 21.4% at 12 months, while progressive disease rates increased from 21.8 to 37.8% over the same period. At 12 months, the ALBI-Sarcopenia score demonstrated the highest predictive accuracy for treatment response (AUC:0.69, p = 0.001), outperforming both the ALBI (AUC: 0.631, p = 0.001) and MELD (AUC:0.623, p = 0.003) scores. Logistic regression identified ALBI-Sarcopenia as a significant independent predictor of response at 1 month (OR:1.25, 95% CI:0.881-1.971, p = 0.002) and 12 months (OR:2.189, 95% CI:0.992-4.937, p = 0.001). The ALBI-Sarcopenia score is a robust predictor of treatment outcomes in HCC, offering superior prognostic accuracy compared to traditional scoring systems, and enhancing patient stratification for optimized treatment planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.