ArticleScientific reports2025
In-vitro assessment and characterization of anticancer, antibacterial, and antioxidant activity of diatom-derived metabolites.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Anticancer and Antimicrobial Activity ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Diatom-Derived Biochemicals: An In-Depth Analysis of Polysaccharides, Extraction Methodologies, and Diverse Applications.Applied biochemistry and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Microalgae are known to produce a spectrum of highly valuable metabolites with substantial nutritional content and pharmacogenetic properties. To explore the antioxidant, antibacterial, as well as anticancer activity of five such microalgal strains isolated from the Indian subcontinent, solvent-based extracts were prepared using methanol:chloroform (S1, v/v) and ethyl acetate (S2). The DPPH and ABTS radical scavenging assays revealed maximum inhibition (65.42% and 69.73%) by S1 extract of Cylindrotheca sp. (D3) and 72.08% and 77.43% by S2 extracts of Chaetoceros sp. (D1), respectively. Both S1 and S2 extract of Cylindrotheca sp. showed maximum zone of inhibition (24 ± 0.4 mm) against Aeromonas sp. and Streptococcus pneumoniae. Further, in-vitro anticancer assessment was also done against renal adenocarcinoma (ACHN), lung carcinoma (A549), and ovarian carcinoma (SK-OV3) cell lines. Highest cytotoxicity was observed when SK-OV3 (63.3%) and A549 (53.6% ) cells were treated with 250 µg mL
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.