Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40287409›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Glucose-6-phosphate-dehydrogenase on old peroxisomes maintains self-renewal of epithelial stem cells after asymmetric cell division.

Hien Bui, Simon Andersson, Agustin Sola-Carvajal, Tommaso De Marchi, Eliisa Vähäkangas, Minna Holopainen, Andrew H House, Bohdana M Rovenko, Johanna I Englund, Maria Kasper and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Hien BuiMolecular and Integrative Biosciences Research Programme, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, 00790, Helsinki, Finland.
Simon Andersson *Molecular and Integrative Biosciences Research Programme, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, 00790, Helsinki, Finland.
Agustin Sola-Carvajal *Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Karolinska Institutet, 17177, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6568-0682
Tommaso De MarchiDivision of Oncology and Surgery, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, 22362, Lund, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4845-1084
Eliisa VähäkangasMolecular and Integrative Biosciences Research Programme, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, 00790, Helsinki, Finland.
Minna HolopainenMolecular and Integrative Biosciences Research Programme, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, 00790, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3030-8677
Andrew H HouseMolecular and Integrative Biosciences Research Programme, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, 00790, Helsinki, Finland.
Bohdana M RovenkoMolecular and Integrative Biosciences Research Programme, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, 00790, Helsinki, Finland.
Johanna I EnglundInstitute of Biotechnology, Helsinki Institute of Life Science (HiLIFE), University of Helsinki, 00790, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9637-6843
Maria KasperDepartment of Cell and Molecular Biology, Karolinska Institutet, 17177, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6117-2717
Emilia KuuluvainenMolecular and Integrative Biosciences Research Programme, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, 00790, Helsinki, Finland.
Reijo KäkeläMolecular and Integrative Biosciences Research Programme, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, 00790, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4953-3062
Ville HietakangasMolecular and Integrative Biosciences Research Programme, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, 00790, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9900-7549
Emma NiméusDivision of Oncology and Surgery, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, 22362, Lund, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0262-9083
Pekka KatajistoMolecular and Integrative Biosciences Research Programme, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, 00790, Helsinki, Finland. pekka.katajisto@helsinki.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3033-4189

Funding

Academy of Finland (Suomen Akatemia) #266869, #304591, #312436, #320185Cancerfonden (Swedish Cancer Society) 190634, 180681, and 222499EC | EC Seventh Framework Programm | FP7 Ideas: European Research Council (FP7-IDEAS-ERC - Specific Programme: "Ideas" Implementing the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Community for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration Activities (2007 to 2013)) ERC, #677809, and #101045009Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse (Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation) KAW 2014.0207 and 20220054Vetenskapsrådet (Swedish Research Council) 2018-03078, 2018-02963, 2022-01304
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Selective inheritance of sub-cellular components has emerged as a mechanism guiding stem cell fate after asymmetric cell divisions. Peroxisomes play a crucial role in multiple metabolic processes such as fatty acid metabolism and reactive oxygen species detoxification, but the apportioning of peroxisomes during stem cell division remains understudied. Here, we develop a mouse model and labeling technique to follow the dynamics of distinct peroxisome age-classes, and find that old peroxisomes are inherited by the daughter cell retaining full stem cell potency in mammary and epidermal stem cell divisions. Old peroxisomes carry Glucose-6-phosphate-dehydrogenase, whose specific location on the peroxisomal membrane promotes stem cell function by facilitating peroxisomal ether lipid synthesis. Our study demonstrates age-selective apportioning of peroxisomes in vivo, and unveils how functional heterogeneity of peroxisomes is utilized by asymmetrically dividing cells to metabolically divert the fate of the two daughter cells.

Indexed as

Asymmetric Cell DivisionCell Self RenewalEpithelial CellsGlucosephosphate DehydrogenasePeroxisomesStem CellsAnimalsFemaleMammary Glands, AnimalMiceMice, Inbred C57BLGlucosephosphate Dehydrogenase

Identifiers

PMID40287409
PMCPMC12033372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.