ReviewFEMS microbiology reviews2025
Molecular typing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a review of current methods, databases, softwares, and analytical tools.
Review in FEMS microbiology reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reference-free clustering as an epidemiological tool forMicrobial genomics · 2026Article
- Genetic diversity of Mycobacterium bovis in dairy products and cattle tissues from northwest Iran using a 12-locus MIRU-VNTR approach.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Detection of drug resistance mutations and spoligotype mapping in Mycobacterium tuberculosis using deeplex sequencing, including novel and uncharacterized spoligotypes.Archives of microbiology · 2026Article
- Genetic diversity and drug resistance profiles ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Article
- Transmission dynamics and attributable burden of tuberculosis among young and middle-aged adults in urban Shanghai: a genomic epidemiology study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Real-time PCR assay for robust detection and global surveillance of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis Haarlem genotype.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Editorial: In commemoration of the bicentennial of the birth of Louis Pasteur.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2025Article
- Comparison and evaluation of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) and real-time PCR for the detection ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
- Beyond H37Rv:Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Studies on the epidemiology and clinical relevance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) have immensely benefited from molecular typing methods, associated software applications, and bioinformatics tools. Over the last two decades, the Pasteur Institute of Guadeloupe has developed a range of bioinformatic resources, including databases and software, to advance understanding of TB epidemiology. Traditional methods, such as IS6110-RFLP, MIRU-VNTR typing, and spoligotyping, have been instrumental but are increasingly supplanted by more precise and high-throughput techniques. These typing methods offer relatively good discrimination and reproducibility, making them popular choices for epidemiological studies. However, the advent of whole-genome sequencing (WGS) has revolutionized Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) typing, providing unparalleled resolution and data analysis depth. WGS enables the identification of single nucleotide polymorphisms and other genetic variations, facilitating robust phylogenetic reconstructions, and detailed outbreak investigations. This review summarizes current molecular typing methods, as well as databases and software tools used for MTBC data analysis. A comprehensive comparison of available tools and databases is provided to guide future research on the epidemiology of TB and pathogen-associated variables (drug resistance or virulence) and public health initiatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.