ArticleZeitschrift fur medizinische Physik2026
Clinical radiation audits as a tool for the optimization of radiation exposure in cardiac electrophysiology procedures.
Article in Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Patient radiation exposure during invasive graft surveillance after heart transplantation.Open heart · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundClinical radiation audits are useful to reduce ionizing radiation in clinical practice. The first Swiss radiation audit in Cardiology took place at the University Heart Center Zurich in 2019.
objectivesTo compare local diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) in cardiac electrophysiology (EP) procedures to the currently available national DRLs and to examine patient radiation exposure before and after the clinical radiation audit.
methodsRetrospective study including 775 patients undergoing EP procedures from 2018- 2020. Main recommendations of the clinical audit were the regular use of collimation, semitransparent filters, the reduction of cine images and frame rates. Patient radiation exposure was evaluated with cumulative doses, fluoroscopy times and dose-area product (DAP). Secondary endpoints were acute procedural success rates and 30-day complications.
results447 (57.5%) patients prior to, and 328 (42.3%) after the audit were included. Cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) was performed in 14.1%, PVI radiofrequency (RF) ablation in 26.8%, RF ablation of right-sided supraventricular tachycardia in 32.1%, other procedures in 27% of cases. Local DRLs for the DAP were below national DRLs (1 Gy cm
conclusionsThe clinical radiation audit was associated with a significant reduction of patient radiation exposure for right-sided supraventricular tachycardia ablation and PVI with RF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.