ArticleThe journal of pain2025
How the clinical encounter shapes diagnostic uncertainty in pediatric chronic pain.
Article in The journal of pain, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Approximately one third of youth with chronic primary pain receiving care in a tertiary care pediatric pain setting, and their parents, report diagnostic uncertainty, which is associated with poorer child pain outcomes and is intricately tied to clinical communication along the pain care journey. This study utilized archived data (collected 2003-2006) to explore components of the clinical encounter that influence diagnostic uncertainty among youth with chronic pain and their parents. Twenty-three youth with chronic primary pain and at least one of their parents who presented for an initial visit at a tertiary pediatric pain clinic participated. Initial clinic intake visits were audio and video recorded, and youth and parents participated in semi-structured interviews prior to, and several months following, their intake appointment. Transcripts of clinical encounters and pre- and post-interviews were analyzed using interpretative phenomenological analysis. Analyses generated four themes: 1) Diagnostic uncertainty is a social phenomenon critically shaped in clinical encounters; 2) (In)validation of pain, the journey, and diagnostic uncertainty; 3) The (missing) link between origin story & pain explanation; and 4) The fragility of certainty. These themes illustrate that youth's and parents' experiences of diagnostic uncertainty are complex, dynamic, and shaped within clinical encounters. The actions taken and explanations provided by clinicians in the clinical encounter can heighten or lower diagnostic uncertainty. Clinician communication, including (in)validation, messages of (un)certainty, elicitation of youth's and parents' pain origin stories and their connection to a pain explanation, influence diagnostic uncertainty and could be targets for assessment, training, and intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.