ArticleExperimental hematology2025
C-COUNT: a convolutional neural network-based tool for automated scoring of erythroid colonies.
Article in Experimental hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite advances in flow cytometry and single-cell transcriptomics, colony-formation assays (CFAs) remain an essential component in the evaluation of erythroid and hematopoietic progenitors. These assays provide functional information on progenitor differentiation and proliferative potential, making them a mainstay of hematology research and clinical diagnosis. However, the utility of CFAs is limited by the time-consuming and error-prone manual counting of colonies, which is also prone to bias and inconsistency. Here we present "C-COUNT," a convolutional neural network-based tool that scores the standard colony-forming-unit-erythroid (CFU-e) assay by reliably identifying CFU-e colonies from images collected by automated microscopy and outputs both their number and size. We tested the performance of C-COUNT against three experienced scientists and find that it is equivalent or better in reliably identifying CFU-e colonies on plates that also contain myeloid colonies and other cell aggregates. We further evaluated its performance in the response of CFU-e progenitors to increasing erythropoietin concentrations and to a spectrum of genotoxic agents. We provide the C-COUNT code, a Docker image, a trained model, and training data set to facilitate its download, usage, and model refinement in other laboratories. The C-COUNT tool transforms the traditional CFU-e CFA into a rigorous and efficient assay with potential applications in high-throughput screens for novel erythropoietic factors and therapeutic agents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.