ArticleThe Science of the total environment2025
Residential indoor temperatures and health: A scoping review of observational studies.
Article in The Science of the total environment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effectiveness and feasibility of residential passive heat adaptation interventions on reducing indoor temperature in low-income communities in Africa: a systematic review.Environmental research, health : ERH · 2026Review
- Observational
- Indoor Thermal Environments, Cooling Access, and Energy Burden in New Orleans, LA: Challenges and Opportunities for Heat Adaptation.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2026Article
- Heat, health and inequalities in the WHO European region - a scoping review with an intersectional lens.International journal for equity in health · 2026Article
- Preventing heat-related illness in people with severe and persistent mental illness: a quality improvement educational intervention.The journal of climate change and healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Adults spend most of their time indoors, especially in higher income countries. Indoor temperature exposures can vary substantially across households, even within a single geographic area. It is therefore critical to understand links between indoor temperature exposures and health or well-being outcomes, and to understand safe maximum indoor residential temperature thresholds that support health, well-being, and comfort. We systematically identified peer-reviewed, observational studies that quantified associations between residential indoor temperatures and mortality/morbidity outcomes. We extracted information on study location; population, health or well-being outcomes; indoor temperature exposure assessment methods; and, when available, empirically quantified safe maximum indoor temperature thresholds. In total, 29 papers were included in the review. The studies were conducted in the following continents: North America (N = 10), Europe (N = 5), Asia (N = 9), Australia (N = 4), and Africa (N = 1). The most common outcomes were cardiovascular morbidity (N = 10) and respiratory morbidity (N = 8) and thermal comfort (N = 9). Exposure assessment methods included data sensors, thermometers, data-driven models, and energy-based simulations. Despite variation in exposure assessment methods and outcomes assessed, results predominately suggested that warmer indoor temperatures were associated with adverse health or well-being outcomes, although in a handful of studies, associations were either null or in the unexpected, protective direction. Empirically identified safe thresholds for indoor temperature ranged from 18 °C to 35 °C and varied according to outcome. Results from this review may be used to inform the design of future studies of associations between indoor temperatures and morbidity or mortality outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.